While it may seem deceiving to have one company marketing/selling another company's product under their own brand name, it does happen all of the time. Doesn't necessarily make it "right" but it is reality. And, if the product is good, meets or exceeds customer expectations (like Spyderco's knives seem to do), then I'd say it's OK.
As a consultant to numerous Fortune 100 organizations I can tell you that this trend of outsourcing the actual physical production of designs will continue to grow. More and more companies will invest in the design of new products, and let the manufacturing be accomlished by one of several firms who have the manufacturing processes & systems to produce top quality products effectively and efficiently. These "design" firms will then market/sell the products. This is all part of a "core competencies" strategy that most businesses are gearing up to follow. So long as we, the consumers, get the products we want & need, and those products meet or exceed our expectations (relative to quality, cost, delivery, etc.) then why would we care WHO actually manufactured them, or WHERE they were actually built or assembled?
In fact, we often get higher quality products at better prices when the "design experts" create the concepts & parameters/specs and the "manufacturing experts" build the products.
Just my $0.02 worth.
AJ
[This message has been edited by AJ (edited 01-13-2000).]
[This message has been edited by AJ (edited 01-13-2000).]
[This message has been edited by AJ (edited 01-13-2000).]