- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,756
I'm looking to make the move into freehand sharpening. With that said, I'm considering one of the Spyderco ceramic bench stones. From what I can gather, the coarseness of the medium stone is comparable to that of 600 grit, and the fine to that of 1200. My question mainly comes down to which is more ideal for touching up a regularly used knife about once a week, sometimes a little sooner, sometimes a little longer. My blades generally don't get all the way to truly dull, but sometimes a day with a good bit of ceiling tile or insulation and S35VN comes along and puts my knife on the bench until I sharpen it.
The majority of my knives are in fact S35VN, some softer like 1095 and some harder like 20CV or K390. I'm okay with spending a few minutes touching up if I have to, and want to be able to take off just enough metal to pop hairs again without taking off too much and unnecessarily reducing service life. I've read that the medium stone is more of a sharpener whereas the fine is more of a "finisher"? I like the idea of getting down to business faster with the medium grit so long as it doesn't overdo it but I'd like to hear the opinion of those more experienced with sharpening than I am. Thanks.
The majority of my knives are in fact S35VN, some softer like 1095 and some harder like 20CV or K390. I'm okay with spending a few minutes touching up if I have to, and want to be able to take off just enough metal to pop hairs again without taking off too much and unnecessarily reducing service life. I've read that the medium stone is more of a sharpener whereas the fine is more of a "finisher"? I like the idea of getting down to business faster with the medium grit so long as it doesn't overdo it but I'd like to hear the opinion of those more experienced with sharpening than I am. Thanks.