Comeuppance
Fixed Blade EDC Emisssary
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 4,765
I have the firstest of world problem: I'm torn between four $150+ blades in exceptional steel and am considering selling my remaining modern folders and just having the full set. I've already purchased the Medium Warcraft Tanto and have a San Mai III Recon Tanto inbound, but, still looking at the 3V version all the same.
There are little to no videos or reviews out there for the 3V versions of these knives, so please do share your experiences and thoughts! Balance, sheathing, edge retention - anything you think is noteworthy!
For reference, so you know what I'm looking at:
What I like about this one is the relatively light weight for the overall length. It's very streamlined and seems to have the best balance of cutting ability out of the three - the tip isn't as obtuse as the Warcraft Tanto, but it isn't as thinly-ground as the Master Tanto. It's also the longest of the Tantos but has a good inch of blade that is not sharpened. Also, despite being the longest of the tantos, it is tied for shortest handle - which makes me concerned about the balance; I'm not looking for a machete, but a all-purpose cutting tool.
Master Tanto:
Weight: 9.5 oz.
Blade Thickness: 5 mm
Blade Length: 6"
Handle: 5 1/2" Long. Kray-Ex
Overall: 11 1/2"
This one has the most style in my eyes. I like the single guard and the metal cap on the handle, as well as the blade profile. Very sleek. I like this one across the board, and it seems to be the classiest of the bunch.
Medium Warcraft Tanto:
Weight: 9.5 oz.
Blade Thickness: 5 mm
Blade Length: 5 1/2"
Handle: 4 1/2" Long. G-10
Overall: 10"
I already have this one on order, so this is basically just for reference. I had the 7-inch version when I was in Denver, but ended up parting with it because it was really just too big and heavy (for reference, the 7-inch is 13oz, and the Recon Tanto with the same blade length is 9.6oz) so I picked the smaller version up as a general-use knife. The handle being raised relative to the cutting edge makes for a very comfortable and natural cutting angle, and the handle is really very comfy indeed. The tip is pretty obtuse, but also essentially indestructible.
Tai Pan:
Weight: 10.8 oz.
Blade Thickness: 5 mm
Blade Length: 7 1/2"
Handle: 5 1/2" Long. Kray-Ex
Overall: 13"
This is the one I fight with myself over the most, which is surprising given that I'm also looking at getting another Recon Tanto despite having one inbound already. Daggers are going to be legal for public carry in Oklahoma very soon, and I honestly cannot think of a dagger I would rather carry than this one. The Counter Tac series is more affordable and more reasonably-sized, but I really dislike how the chisel-grind looks. With the 3V, metal guard and handle cap, and fully-hollow-ground blade, my only hesitation is the overall size of this knife. I worry that I'm not going to be able to really maneuver this as a cutting tool. I think I want it as a sort of indulgence more than I want it as a cutting tool, but please feel free to convince me that it could be useful so I can justify buying this.
These are all relatively large fixed blades, made from my favorite steel (3V) with my favorite sheath system (kydex with loads of eyelets) with a corrosion-resistant high-wear coating (DLC). Each one of these runs about $130-190, which puts them in the "quality production folder" price range. Given that I've almost completely abandoned folding knives at this point (I just have some traditional folders, a Kershaw Launch 6, and an 0452CF for carry at the moment) I think I can justify the expense if I really want to, especially if I sell the 0452CF. My concern is that these will prove to be unwieldy as cutting tools because they are clearly designed for totally killing dudes.
So, assuming you had the option of getting anywhere between one and all of them, which ones would you choose and why? Which have you handled and have experience with?
There are little to no videos or reviews out there for the 3V versions of these knives, so please do share your experiences and thoughts! Balance, sheathing, edge retention - anything you think is noteworthy!
For reference, so you know what I'm looking at:
Recon Tanto:
Blade Length: 7"
Overall Length: 11 3/4"
Handle: 4 3/4" Long Kray-Ex
Weight: 9.6 oz
Blade Thickness: 5mm
Blade Length: 7"
Overall Length: 11 3/4"
Handle: 4 3/4" Long Kray-Ex
Weight: 9.6 oz
Blade Thickness: 5mm

What I like about this one is the relatively light weight for the overall length. It's very streamlined and seems to have the best balance of cutting ability out of the three - the tip isn't as obtuse as the Warcraft Tanto, but it isn't as thinly-ground as the Master Tanto. It's also the longest of the Tantos but has a good inch of blade that is not sharpened. Also, despite being the longest of the tantos, it is tied for shortest handle - which makes me concerned about the balance; I'm not looking for a machete, but a all-purpose cutting tool.
Master Tanto:
Weight: 9.5 oz.
Blade Thickness: 5 mm
Blade Length: 6"
Handle: 5 1/2" Long. Kray-Ex
Overall: 11 1/2"

This one has the most style in my eyes. I like the single guard and the metal cap on the handle, as well as the blade profile. Very sleek. I like this one across the board, and it seems to be the classiest of the bunch.
Medium Warcraft Tanto:
Weight: 9.5 oz.
Blade Thickness: 5 mm
Blade Length: 5 1/2"
Handle: 4 1/2" Long. G-10
Overall: 10"

I already have this one on order, so this is basically just for reference. I had the 7-inch version when I was in Denver, but ended up parting with it because it was really just too big and heavy (for reference, the 7-inch is 13oz, and the Recon Tanto with the same blade length is 9.6oz) so I picked the smaller version up as a general-use knife. The handle being raised relative to the cutting edge makes for a very comfortable and natural cutting angle, and the handle is really very comfy indeed. The tip is pretty obtuse, but also essentially indestructible.
Tai Pan:
Weight: 10.8 oz.
Blade Thickness: 5 mm
Blade Length: 7 1/2"
Handle: 5 1/2" Long. Kray-Ex
Overall: 13"

This is the one I fight with myself over the most, which is surprising given that I'm also looking at getting another Recon Tanto despite having one inbound already. Daggers are going to be legal for public carry in Oklahoma very soon, and I honestly cannot think of a dagger I would rather carry than this one. The Counter Tac series is more affordable and more reasonably-sized, but I really dislike how the chisel-grind looks. With the 3V, metal guard and handle cap, and fully-hollow-ground blade, my only hesitation is the overall size of this knife. I worry that I'm not going to be able to really maneuver this as a cutting tool. I think I want it as a sort of indulgence more than I want it as a cutting tool, but please feel free to convince me that it could be useful so I can justify buying this.
These are all relatively large fixed blades, made from my favorite steel (3V) with my favorite sheath system (kydex with loads of eyelets) with a corrosion-resistant high-wear coating (DLC). Each one of these runs about $130-190, which puts them in the "quality production folder" price range. Given that I've almost completely abandoned folding knives at this point (I just have some traditional folders, a Kershaw Launch 6, and an 0452CF for carry at the moment) I think I can justify the expense if I really want to, especially if I sell the 0452CF. My concern is that these will prove to be unwieldy as cutting tools because they are clearly designed for totally killing dudes.
So, assuming you had the option of getting anywhere between one and all of them, which ones would you choose and why? Which have you handled and have experience with?