- Joined
- Dec 6, 2012
- Messages
- 31
Hey everyone.
So I've pretty much narrowed down my next EDC knife to one of these two. They are around the same price ($50-60) and I can't for the life of me decide. They both seem like great knives, and they each have something about them I like over the other. I've made a pro/con list, but still can't decide! Maybe you guys can help. I've owned a Hold Out III before, but lost it, so I know how that one feels, but never owned a D4. Both are roughly the same size blade and handle.
Hold Out III
1. Thin and light (+)
2. FFG (+)
3. Grippy G10 (+)
4. Reminiscent of a Scottish sgian dubh (+) [I'm Scottish in heritage, been to Scotland and love it, so this has sentimental value]
5. Tri-Ad Lock (-/+) [Very sturdy, obviously one of the beefiest locks on the market, but also can be hard to close]
6. Very little ergonomics (-)
7. Pocket clip [unimportant, since I remove my pocket clips from my knives]
8. Hardly any gimping (-)
Delica 4 FFG
1. FFG (+)
2. Spyder hole (+)
3. Thin and light (+)
4. FRN (-) [I dislike the feel of FRN, it feels cheap in my hand. I know it isn't, but I just can't shake the feel]
5. Spyder hole makes blade wider in the pocket (-)
6. Midlock (+) [good, simple, easy to use, and not a bear like the tri-ad]
7. Pocket clip [unimportant]
8. Color choice (+)
9. Great gimping (+)
10. Good ergonomics (+)
11. Aesthetically not as pleasing as the HO3 (-)
As you can see, I still don't know which to choose. It's a toss up. The HO3 has sentimental value, is very sturdy, and is a bit cheaper ($10), but the D4 is praised by most who use it as a near-perfect EDC. My main question is this:
Having handled and loved the HO3, is there anything the D4 can offer that makes it superior enough to switch my fancy to it?
Can anyone help me here???
Thanks
So I've pretty much narrowed down my next EDC knife to one of these two. They are around the same price ($50-60) and I can't for the life of me decide. They both seem like great knives, and they each have something about them I like over the other. I've made a pro/con list, but still can't decide! Maybe you guys can help. I've owned a Hold Out III before, but lost it, so I know how that one feels, but never owned a D4. Both are roughly the same size blade and handle.
Hold Out III
1. Thin and light (+)
2. FFG (+)
3. Grippy G10 (+)
4. Reminiscent of a Scottish sgian dubh (+) [I'm Scottish in heritage, been to Scotland and love it, so this has sentimental value]
5. Tri-Ad Lock (-/+) [Very sturdy, obviously one of the beefiest locks on the market, but also can be hard to close]
6. Very little ergonomics (-)
7. Pocket clip [unimportant, since I remove my pocket clips from my knives]
8. Hardly any gimping (-)
Delica 4 FFG
1. FFG (+)
2. Spyder hole (+)
3. Thin and light (+)
4. FRN (-) [I dislike the feel of FRN, it feels cheap in my hand. I know it isn't, but I just can't shake the feel]
5. Spyder hole makes blade wider in the pocket (-)
6. Midlock (+) [good, simple, easy to use, and not a bear like the tri-ad]
7. Pocket clip [unimportant]
8. Color choice (+)
9. Great gimping (+)
10. Good ergonomics (+)
11. Aesthetically not as pleasing as the HO3 (-)
As you can see, I still don't know which to choose. It's a toss up. The HO3 has sentimental value, is very sturdy, and is a bit cheaper ($10), but the D4 is praised by most who use it as a near-perfect EDC. My main question is this:
Having handled and loved the HO3, is there anything the D4 can offer that makes it superior enough to switch my fancy to it?
Can anyone help me here???
Thanks