My intent is not to stir the pot either but I've now read enough posts to understand why some are biased against Cold Steel. I bought a Master Hunter in Carbon V made in the US and it's a fine hard use knife. I also have a Pro Lite (AUS6, Taiwan) from a trade that is tough, well made, and a lot of folder for use that would abuse a nice small slip joint. That being said, I fault only their imported products (maybe all now, I'm not sure). There are many, many knives of US manufacture that are affordable and good values so I don't have to choose imported.
I fault other companies for not giving enough or even any information about their knives: HC stainless? 400 series stainless? A standard for 80 years? Since 1890? Sharpest out of the box? A Name You Can Depend On? (substitute your own dates and slogans). All that kind of ad jargon tells me nothing! If you search hard enough, more information can be found but it's the exception. For example, Buck has a good website content, and there are others equally informative.
At least Cold Steel tells and shows us something. They hang weights from their folder handles, cut rope, slice tubing, bend blades in a vice, and throw folders. Maybe it's schlocky but at least it's an attempt to go beyond a name or a slogan. They also do their own demos without using an ad agency with male models. Maybe the CD is a lot of visual stuff without quantitative comparisons, but at least it's there and it's free! Cold Steel gets an A for effort. When another mass manufacturer produces a CD that is better, I'll reconsider my opinion. Regards, ss.