Cold Steel Mackinac Hunter

Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
2,154
So I was looking for a more traditional looking knife, similar to my old Buck 110 but that had some modern upgrades. I wanted a pocket clip, thumb studs for one handed opening and a less bulky profile.

Enter the Cold Steel Mackinac Hunter...
For a $50 knife I am very impressed with the feel, fit and finish. This thing feels of quality and durability.

First off it is much thinner in profile than the Buck 110 and has the pocket clip. Slides in and out of the pocket easy yet the small clip has very good retention. The knife also rides just deep enough to not be overly "deep carry". I hate having to fish way down into my pocket to get blades with super deep carry. You do get a spare pocket clip with every knife, and free stuff is always good.

The blade is AUS8 opposed to the 440 of the 110. AUS8 is fine.. keeps a decent edge and is easy to sharpen. Every knife doesn't have to be a super steel and I think sometimes we are a bit spoiled with the amazing steels being made today. It has an attractive hollow grind that I preferred the looks of over it's bigger flat ground brother the "Lone Star Hunter". The wide blade has lots of belly and comes down to a fairly substantial tip. Lockup is tight both up/down and side/side. Out of the box it was hair shaving sharp.

The Mackinac Hunter has nice thumb studs making one handed opening very easy. I don't find the studs off-putting or taking away from the looks of the knife but a nail nick version is also available if you want the traditional look and two handed opening.

The lock is the Tri-Ad lock which is well known to be a substantial locking mechanism. The lock is very strong but also requires quite a bit of force to close. You have to depress the back-lock all the way down to get this sucker to disengage. The edges of the lock are a bit sharp on my specimen but a little sanding should clean that up and make a bit more comfortable. You can close with one hand but make sure your index finger is high in the choil or you could get nicked by the blade. I've done the "depress lock and give a little wrist action to get the blade to stop on my index finger knuckle" lots of times and no scars yet.

It is heavy at over 5oz but so is the 110, so wash. The body is built completely out of metal other than the Durlin faux bone scales. The scales are the one thing that I think people will have issue with.. but again minor. They don't look awful but they don't look great either. They used Durlin opposed to real bone/stag for two reasons. One to keep cost down, and second b/c over time of wet use (blood, water, etc) the real bone would shrink and crack.. making owners even more upset. So it's more of a function over form thing. The nice thing is that they are just screwed on, so if you want to pimp it out with G10, micarta, carbon fiber or real bone, you can do that too. The ergonomics of the knife are very nice and I don't get any hot spots when gripping the knife hard for periods of time.

Once small thing I like is the back-spacer is a gray bead blasted aluminum I think. It breaks up all the polished steel and adds a nice touch.

If you want a traditional looking knife that is robust and made for one handed opening, give this a shot.

Enjoy the pics!!

p1020488te.jpg

p1020482gw.jpg

p1020483u.jpg

p1020484f.jpg

p1020485o.jpg

p1020486h.jpg

p1020489y.jpg

p1020487i.jpg
 
Nice review. Having handled a Mackinac (without the thumb stud) I've found the folder to be quite substantial not overbuilt, however and comparable to the 110 and similar folders. With that being said it has a pocket clip, but lacks the thumb stud. All in all for most practical purposes I feel that I'd be better served by the Mackinac with a thumb stud. Still I'm not sure what to think about the scales:confused:. At the end of the day I find modern knives with traditional touches here and their to be very interesting in their styling.
 
Last edited:
If only they didn't have those blasted ugly faux stag scales...slap some micarta or jigged bone on that puppy!
 
Nice review, thanks. Definitely seems worth a look, though I'm with you all on the scales- maybe they'll come out with an alternative.
 
I love how Cold Steel takes designs 90% of the way. I suppose it allows for individual creativity.
 
I love how Cold Steel takes designs 90% of the way. I suppose it allows for individual creativity.

Keeps the profit margins higher.

I have to say, I do like the look and thought of this knife. I would love a version with full covers, made of various materials.

One thing about it, It should be pretty easy to fit different covers to this design.

Burnt stag would be cool!



I am a fan of the triad lock from experience. I have also moved away from tactical folders. I tend to carry traditional slip joints in bone or stag.

So this knife is a good looking alternative.

I would like a flat ground version of this knife. The lonestar is flat ground, but I like this handle/blade shape better.

My other thing I would change would be the nail nick. Make it a long pull. Just looks better to my eye. I love a good long pull. Not that you really need it. The blade is big enough to just pinch open.
 
Last edited:
This one slipped by me, thanks for the review! Nice knive, and nice pictures!
 
I have the "sister" model, the Lone Star Hunter. I like the overall shape of the knife, but the handle is really, really slippery. I took the scales off and even the bare steel is better.

I had in mind to make new, a bit more substantial and more grippy scales of wood, started the process by making roughly right shape oak pieces. Then I got this great idea to make metric 3 mm threads to the scale bolt holes so I could use longer bolts. Bad idea. Now I have to pin and glue those scales in place. Oh well... guess this a learning process :)
 
the handle is really, really slippery

This is the downfall of this knife.. but easily fixable with either sandpaper or some homemade scales.
The clip is strong and I've found myself having to use a good bit of force to get the knife out b/c the scales are slippery.
 
Because of this review & pictures,i am waiting on one that should arrive wed. i like it,its different,inexpenseive, & its very easy to make scales for this, they just ride on top of the ss frame. ive got walnut,corian & dymondwood, ill have to see which one i use on it....
 
This will be one pimped out knife with the ease of scale modification. Cant wait to see some
 
One of my favorite knives. Great review!

Neki2...I tossed some cf pants on mine. Im on a mobile browser right so i am not able to post links to the pics but if you search my posts under my user name youll find the pics. Maybe someone could link the pics here for you.
 
I grabbed a M.H. in my last order and I'm happy that I did. I find it attractive in hand with a nice sized sweeping hollow grind blade. It doesn't feel quite as heavy as a Ka-Bar Mule, which I still like regardless. But it has a bit more heft than the Voyagers. A bit of weight in a folder never bothered me. Depression for the blade release requires me to almost bottom it, no biggy either because all of my Tri-ads mellow a bit after break in. This knife looks and feels great to me. The plastic grips ?, I don't care. Most manufacturers use synthetics of one sort or another. I don't find the grips to be terribly slippery either, but they are pretty smooth so I can see that comment as legit. This thing feels like a little tank and for 50 bucks it came with a Buck 110 like leather sheath. My only minor complaint is the typical C.S. insanely tight pocket clip, which I will likely remove. I really like this folder.
:thumbup:

IMG_5624_zps60e0fb90.jpg
 
Back
Top