R.W.Clark said:
Pilot, your reading the law wrong. CO law states that you can not carry any knife with a blade over 3.5" except "hunting and fishing" knives carried for legitimate sporting uses. It does not say that the sporting use MUST BE hunting. I would think that hiking would qualify as sporting use under the meaning of CO law. Just be sure that the knife you chose leans more to the hunter side in styling and is less weaponish than many of the larger blades on the market.
I'm not an attorney, but here is the section we're both referencing from the CO statute.
"(f) "Knife" means any dagger, dirk, knife, or stiletto with a blade over three and one-half inches in length, or any other dangerous instrument capable of inflicting cutting, stabbing, or tearing wounds, but does not include a hunting or fishing knife carried for sports use. The issue that a knife is a hunting or fishing knife must be raised as an affirmative defense."
So, you're interpretting that the style of knife is also the issue, not only the activity in which you are engaged. I would tend to agree with that, but I also could not find the definition of "sports use" anywhere. I imagine they are leaving it ambiguous for interpretation from the courts. That scares me a little. While I think hiking, camping and backpacking is "sports use", a jury and/or judge may not. On the other hand, walking around town buying fishing tackle on your way to the lake may be considered a sports use, but again, I wouldn't trust a jury to rule that way.
Maybe I'll just carry a gun from now on as that is well defined within my CCW permit. If I get caught in bad weather and have to build a shelter on a day hike, I'll just shoot off the branches.
