Well my Colt slippies arrived today, so some (brief) thoughts and comparisons.
My photography sucks, so rest assured all the knives look better in the flesh......
Firstly, both came in really nice quite classy boxes - but I forgot to take photo's of them...:grumpy:
The Muskrat is a surprisingly heavy handful and really does come across that it could take some serious abuse. The "spey" blade (if you can call it that) is actually quite funky and I've not really seen anything like it before, but it's actually quite nice. This is a very comfortable knife to use.
Not a hint of blade play, but the blades could be finished better.
The stockman is a very attractive little knife, with the scales filling the hand quite well. Again, no blade play and the blades could be finished better. A disappointment was that it had blade rub from the box (but then again, so did my £55 Case stockman!!)
Both knives are let down by minor finishing flaws. The bolsters are obviously cast and it shows. The inside of the Colt "C" tells you this. The Colt emblem in the scales also looks a bit "cheap" close up. These are all things that you could rectify with a dremel and polishing attachment in minutes, but they could have made a bit more effort here.
So, the inevitable comparison to Rough Rider and the CRKT classics..
Out of the box, the RR's are the sharpest by a country mile, with the CRKT's second. The Colts were not that great and the Muskrat struggled to cut paper.
Overall fit and finish, the CRKT's win. It's actually hard to fault them. Give the spine / back springs a polish and you'd be forgiven in thinking that you're holding a Case.
The Colts are a step up from RR, but not by a lot at all. However, the walk and talk on the Colts are best and they have a very nice positive half stop which has a real feeling of quality.
The finish on the blades is better on the RR's and CRKT's, with the CRKT's being the best.
Overall, these are actually quite nice knives. Pricing is about right, being between RR and CRKT.
Just a short ramble, so any questions just ask...
My photography sucks, so rest assured all the knives look better in the flesh......
Firstly, both came in really nice quite classy boxes - but I forgot to take photo's of them...:grumpy:
The Muskrat is a surprisingly heavy handful and really does come across that it could take some serious abuse. The "spey" blade (if you can call it that) is actually quite funky and I've not really seen anything like it before, but it's actually quite nice. This is a very comfortable knife to use.
Not a hint of blade play, but the blades could be finished better.
The stockman is a very attractive little knife, with the scales filling the hand quite well. Again, no blade play and the blades could be finished better. A disappointment was that it had blade rub from the box (but then again, so did my £55 Case stockman!!)
Both knives are let down by minor finishing flaws. The bolsters are obviously cast and it shows. The inside of the Colt "C" tells you this. The Colt emblem in the scales also looks a bit "cheap" close up. These are all things that you could rectify with a dremel and polishing attachment in minutes, but they could have made a bit more effort here.
So, the inevitable comparison to Rough Rider and the CRKT classics..
Out of the box, the RR's are the sharpest by a country mile, with the CRKT's second. The Colts were not that great and the Muskrat struggled to cut paper.
Overall fit and finish, the CRKT's win. It's actually hard to fault them. Give the spine / back springs a polish and you'd be forgiven in thinking that you're holding a Case.
The Colts are a step up from RR, but not by a lot at all. However, the walk and talk on the Colts are best and they have a very nice positive half stop which has a real feeling of quality.
The finish on the blades is better on the RR's and CRKT's, with the CRKT's being the best.
Overall, these are actually quite nice knives. Pricing is about right, being between RR and CRKT.
Just a short ramble, so any questions just ask...