The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
The majority of combo edges are made wrong imho. Most have the serrations after the plain edge. You know towards the handle. I think they should be at the front of the blade towards the point. Much more useful I think...
...But for me, it has to be at least a 3.5” blade. Too much shorter than that, and neither edge is long enough to really be usable.
On a 3 1/2 inch blade I would like 3 inches of plain edge and a half inch serrated. Better yet give me a 4 inch blade with 1 inch serrated.
I did some mods on a Gerber multi-tool a few years ago. One item was to remove the combo monstrosity and replace it with a full serrated blade. Works like a champ.
If I carry a MT, it is in addition to my plain edge folder.
I’d actually take 2.5” plain edge, and a full inch of serrated. Anything less, and the serrations are useless to me in most cases.
It’s funny you mention a Gerber MT. The blade on my Crucial is exactly why I dislike small combo edges. At less than 2”, there just isn’t enough edge for both. The serrations are almost a full inch, which is useful for most tasks, but the plain edge is just to short to really do much of anything useful in a working environment. I know the Crucial is a bit of a compromise itself as MT’s go, but the blade should really be one or the other.
The BG Ultimate is another example of a poorly executed combo edge. At almost 5” overall, those serrations take up almost half the blade, and most of the prime cutting edge where you’d want some slicing capability.
![]()