comparison: Rat vs the others

Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
1,277
Although I'm not new to knives, I have really taken a keen interest these past 2 1/2years. I went along for the 38 years after my S.E.Asia tours with 4 knives: GI Kabar, Buck 110, Esquire and a 119. I'm now up to 28 and counting. I'm not slinging the b/s when I say my RC-5 and 6, which just arrived (my RC-4 is on backorder) are superb knives. Every detail is perfect. Every line flows into another and the fit and finish are flawless. While not inexpensive, the value for me is the aesthetics, utility and ruggedness of the product. I like 1095, some guys do not. Quite frankly, I own some of the other brands. Let's just say Tops is not, Becker is not what it used to be. My old buck 124 knives hold a razor edge as well as the old kabars and KBD1 and a few others I own. Simply stated Rat quality is unequalled. Thanks for a great product and one that does everything you claim.
 
Welcome to the RAT pack! I too was astounded by the quality of the product in relation to the price. I don't mind paying a bit more when the quality of the product justifies the premium. My RAT knives are worth every cent. My first was an RC6. Followed by an RC4 then the RC5. Great knives from great people!
 
Welcome and well said.
In our house, we have discovered that the RATs are greater than or equal to knives of higher cost... begs the question why spend more?
 
RAT knives are WAY overpriced, so I think Jeff should send us all a free HEST when it comes out :p

I agree, though. RAT are one of the best knives on the market :thumbup:
 
When you factor in the fact that the RAT line are really pretty much mid tech knives, with the scales being fitted by hand and the final edges being put on by hand it really puts the price into perspective.

Granted, you can get similar knives for a lower price point but chances are that the level of fit and finish will be lower and the sheathing options won't be up to par with what you get with a RAT and the warranty won't be as good and the heat treat won't be as good and the design won't be as good and their moderators won't be as good and.....:D

You get the point.
 
Welcome to the RAT Pack!

RAT Cutlery is proof that good old American ingenuity & hard work are alive & well!:thumbup:
 
Welcome and since you are comparing your rats to other knives I will add my recent comparison on your thread. I purchased a RC- 3 a short while back and promised a review compared with a fallkniven F1 when I went camping with my son. So here it is. I must first say that it was not a side by side comparison it was basically I on a 3 day trip I used the rat the first day for whatever the fallkniven thesecond and the rat on the 3rd. During this time I used both for cutting vegetables (onions,tomatoes), cheese, meat(dried beef) nylon rope, cleaned 2 medium 1 small fish, and whittled two sets of chop sticks just to get some wood work in. I must say that I found both knives fully up to the task of all the jobs set before it. Now on personal likes and dislikes. I really like the ergonomics of the RC3 better. It fits my hand perfectly and I like the way the handle design acts as a finger gaurd to insure my hand does not hit the blade. I also like that if I choose to I can use the curve in the choil as a finger groove and choke up for better control on push cuts (I used this method on the chop sticks). The rats thinness made it a slightly better slicer than the fallkniven which was not slouch by far. Its just that on softer items like the cheese the fallkniven did not cut as smoothly. Both cleaned fish well and both sliced ropes without any needs for touch ups. Being 1095 I did notice even after wiping dry on the uncoated part of the blade when I got home on day 3. Both had good edge retention and I did not need to touch up either knife. Now for my conclusions:
I believe that overall the RC3 won simply if for no other reason it was more comfortable to work with. The RC3 did show signs of rust because I did not use any oil while out in the field, on that note I wanted to know what it would be like under true field conditions where I might not be able to oil my knife after every use. This small amount of rust did not affect its cutting ability any though. The fallkniven I think slightly shines on the simple fact that it has a slightly longer and narrower blade and I think for general utility this serves a better purpose along with its better corrosion resistant qualities. My theory is if a knife is a working knife then it must be comfortable and when all else is considered when comparing equal or similar knives the comfort factor is what will win a victory every time. When hands were wet I found the RC3's grip to be better than the fallkniven.
So my breakdown is this
Fallkniven(things better than RC3)- better rust resistance, more edge, narrower profile, easier to conseal for everyday carry.
RC3 (things better than F1)- handle safety(keeping fingers of blade), better slicer due to thin profile, warmer union between hand and handle, shorter legal in places the F1 might not be, a true EDC.
 
One other review that I would like to see is probably a comparison between a RC3 and a grohmann boat knife. I own one myself but I will probably not be going back camping until this september as work and school schedules will not permit it. I think that these blades are closer in comparison than the F1 as the grohmann blade is thinner, super sharp, and a nice warm handle with the same safety built into the design of the knife to keep you hand off of the blade. Can anybody do a comparison? Or does anyone have any thoughts on the two?
 
Back
Top