- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 4,363
I used my Condor Golok today to chop up some dead limbs and brush for burning. I decided to compare its chopping performance with my thinner Condor Puerto Rican machete of about the same size.
The PR machete is much thinner (about 2.2 mm) and made of 420HC steel. But it is a heck of a chopper, going through some hard wood in just 10 chops. Last year in my big chop off, it even beat my Busse FFBM (before I full convexed the edge).
The Golok did about the same in 11 chops. The golok is much more comfortable to chop with, but performance wise, its about the same. It's the handle that makes it so much better for chopping.
The thicker blade and heavier weight did not seem to make a difference.
The golok will fit it the PR sheath, but I have an old Martindale machete sheath to carry it in that works fine.
All this makes me wonder how a thinner golok in Condor's 420HC would perform. I think it would do fine, based on my use today. And it doesn't rust. I realize that many on this forum prefer the 1070 carbon steel, but I have had nothing but good performance from their 420HC.

The PR machete is much thinner (about 2.2 mm) and made of 420HC steel. But it is a heck of a chopper, going through some hard wood in just 10 chops. Last year in my big chop off, it even beat my Busse FFBM (before I full convexed the edge).


The Golok did about the same in 11 chops. The golok is much more comfortable to chop with, but performance wise, its about the same. It's the handle that makes it so much better for chopping.

The thicker blade and heavier weight did not seem to make a difference.

The golok will fit it the PR sheath, but I have an old Martindale machete sheath to carry it in that works fine.


All this makes me wonder how a thinner golok in Condor's 420HC would perform. I think it would do fine, based on my use today. And it doesn't rust. I realize that many on this forum prefer the 1070 carbon steel, but I have had nothing but good performance from their 420HC.
Last edited: