QUOTE=killa_concept;12152653]... heat treating 1050 to 57hrc isn't beyond the steel's limitations and it most certainly isn't for 1060 and 5160. I feel like Council is just keeping their axes in the high 40s to low 50s for fear of screwing up the odd batch and so that they don't have to be as spot on with the heat treat, thus saving money. Perfectly acceptable for their regular line of 1060, but for the premium they're asking for their Velvicut, I'd definitely expect the 5160 to consistency be in the 55-57hrc range.[/QUOTE]
Council is vary aware of the low priority placed on edged tools by most of the market and their need to compete with offshore manufacturers. There is little wiggle room during production for mistakes and experimentation which may account for the "play it safe" attitude. Nonetheless, they are also very appreciative of suggestions that help them in their goals of raising standards while staying competitive in a very limited market. I'd suggest a phone call or polite letter delineating your wants and desires.
Also, I wouldn't even blink an eye to pick up a Velvicut Jersey Perfect on a 32" handle if they improved their HT. As for the 32" on the boy's axe though, I couldn't see them justifying the production as it would be too niche. Heads under 2.5lbs rarely find their way onto handles longer than 28"
I just stumbled on a near mint True Temper Jersey Perfect with a 28 inch handle so I'm covered there

Being on the tall side I prefer the 36" ones I've got even though a few are beaters with little use other than splitting.
My reasoning behind a lighter axe head on a longer handle is twofold. First: There aren't many appropriate sized small axes for tall people. If you're over 6'4'' then a 28" axe is more like a glorified hatchet IMHO. While not in Steve Tall's category, I don't use boy's axes for chopping much of anything as I value my lower extremities far too much. My Council Boy's axe is mostly used for free hand trimming/limbing. If I'm going to buck a log I reach for a 36" full sized axe. The same is true for splitting. I get greater head speed due to the longer radius arc which saves my strength plus I don't have to squat or bend at the waist so much which seems to prolong my endurance and takes the strain off the psoas muscle - a major contributor to low back strain. This is not to be confused with "race" chopping in which every available muscle group is used to its utmost. Longer handles soften the shock load and are easier on the joints, too.
Second: Longer handled smaller axes are also excellent for smaller statured people including many women. My significant other maxes out at 3lbs on a 30" handle with 2lb10oz being the most comfortable we've found but we don't have any in between those two. She can also manage a 32" handle length when splitting/bucking if the head is lighter. I have a 2.5lb Agdor that she uses despite the handle being a little thick.
I think there
is a market for the small head/long handled tool once the benefits are understood. I know that the older I get the lighter the tools will have to be. It's not a race anymore.