Copperlocks Go the Spa (Again)

AFAustin

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
2,488
For the last year or two, I’ve had a Copperlock dilemma. I like Case knives and I’ve long been a fan of the Copperlock pattern, but with some reservations. I don’t like the exaggerated clip with the high ridge on the spine, as I think it breaks the clean lines of the knife and is disproportionate to the blade’s narrow waist. In other words I’d prefer a more streamlined look. And recently there’s been a second issue.

But other than that, there’s a lot to like: long pull; beautiful swedge; the blade, especially the last 1/3 toward the tip, is ground thin---perfect for slicing. And the Copperlock, and its little brother the Mini Copperlock, often feature some very nice bone.

The Copperlock has an interesting history, and it’s summarized by a Case historian as quoted in a post (#4) by Modoc ED a while back: Case Copperlock | BladeForums.com

Up until recently, my only issue has been the blade shape. So a while back, I did some outpatient surgery on my Copperlock (goldenrod jigged bone) and Mini Copperlock (smooth chestnut bone) and “de-humped” the clip blade.

I never took any “before” pics, but here’s what the Copperlock and Mini Copperlock look like in stock form, courtesy of my friend analoghog (Mike):

9rVUNaEl.jpg


And here’s what my original two look like post-surgery:

EeGPBcfl.jpg


So I was happy with my modded Copperlock pair. But then I had the chance to acquire another pair, a full size Copperlock in purple appaloosa bone and a Mini in olive jigged bone with threaded bolsters. I really liked the knives except for two things: my usual complaint about the blade shape, and a new one---the sharp and uncomfortable front bolsters.

Initially I wondered if these two knives were of a more recent vintage than my original pair, and perhaps Case had lately started making the Copperlock bolsters protrude more and with a sharper edge. In fact, the smooth chestnut Mini Copperlock is a 2012 model while the olive green one is 2017. But with the full size Copperlocks, the goldenrod is 2013 and the purple appaloosa is from 1998. So I guess the bolster shape is just an unpredictable feature from year-to-year and knife-to-knife.

Here’s a couple of pics showing the (stock) bolsters on my previous pair next to the sharper and more protruding ones on my new acquisitions. If the difference doesn’t appear huge, I can assure you there’s a big difference in how they feel in hand---my hand at least.

q8LwbHWl.jpg


RcEt6jnl.jpg


And here was my dilemma: the new pair were too uncomfortable to carry and use---but I liked them too much to sell. And I didn’t entirely trust myself to attempt another mod as I’m a complete amateur and this pair was just too nice to mess up.

So there they sat, and for way too long, until it finally sunk in: What good are they if I’m not going to use them? I decided to take the plunge.

Once again, I have no “before” pics. So please refer to the pics above from Mike which are a good representation of the stock blade shape which these had.

And here’s the result:

ZEVymKyl.jpg


2qQYaqnl.jpg


7stp6qFl.jpg


of0PwyAl.jpg


As you can see, this mod produced a different blade shape than my earlier one: a slightly fuller blade and a slightly stouter and less acute tip. But, as in the previous mod, the “hump” on the spine is gone.

This time, I also addressed the sharp front bolsters. With the sharp edges taken down, when the knives are closed the tang is not 100% covered. But almost, and in any event the tangs are rounded, as is typical with Case knives (and which I much prefer), so there’s no pocket snagging at all.

It has always interested me how a small tweak or two to a knife can greatly change how I feel about it. These most recent mods are no exception.

I realize that any modifications to the classic Copperlock pattern may be heresy to its many fans. But my take is simple---I now actually enjoy carrying and using these nice blades. After all, isn’t that the whole point?

Thanks for taking a look,

Andrew

Xo9Ewgrl.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have the same issue with it as you do. It's a great pattern, but the blade shape is a little weird and I don't really like bolsters that hang that far below the tang of the knife. I have often wished (and dreamt of) that Case would make a Lockback Large Single Blade Trapper... that would solve all my issues. 🤣
 
I got a Copperhead Wharncliffe years ago which I adore, and always thought I’d like it even more as a single blade, so I jumped on a CV Copperlock Wharncliffe I found and used and carried it for about a year.

I don’t really like it, though. The bolster hanging down is awkward for me in use because it actually seems to shorten the useable grip, and while as a lock back this length I find the thin grip side to side okay, the depth backspring to blade channel is just not deep enough.

I stopped carrying it without analyzing all of that, just acknowledged that I didn’t like carrying it and went on to other things (mostly back to my Copperhead and SAKs), but recently got a Tribal Lock and compared them. The Tribal Lock comparison gave me the points I couldn’t articulate before, and is much better in all respects that the Copperlock bugged me. I may actually sell it.
 
One of the best parts of our hobby is modifying knives to make them “ours”! Even small changes can make a big difference in looks and use, nice job:)
 
Thanks, guys, for all the kind comments and likes. Much appreciated.

Andrew
 
For the last year or two, I’ve had a Copperlock dilemma. I like Case knives and I’ve long been a fan of the Copperlock pattern, but with some reservations. I don’t like the exaggerated clip with the high ridge on the spine, as I think it breaks the clean lines of the knife and is disproportionate to the blade’s narrow waist. In other words I’d prefer a more streamlined look. And recently there’s been a second issue.

But other than that, there’s a lot to like: long pull; beautiful swedge; the blade, especially the last 1/3 toward the tip, is ground thin---perfect for slicing. And the Copperlock, and its little brother the Mini Copperlock, often feature some very nice bone.

The Copperlock has an interesting history, and it’s summarized by a Case historian as quoted in a post (#4) by Modoc ED a while back: Case Copperlock | BladeForums.com

Up until recently, my only issue has been the blade shape. So a while back, I did some outpatient surgery on my Copperlock (goldenrod jigged bone) and Mini Copperlock (smooth chestnut bone) and “de-humped” the clip blade.

I never took any “before” pics, but here’s what the Copperlock and Mini Copperlock look like in stock form, courtesy of my friend analoghog (Mike):

9rVUNaEl.jpg


And here’s what my original two look like post-surgery:

EeGPBcfl.jpg


So I was happy with my modded Copperlock pair. But then I had the chance to acquire another pair, a full size Copperlock in purple appaloosa bone and a Mini in olive jigged bone with threaded bolsters. I really liked the knives except for two things: my usual complaint about the blade shape, and a new one---the sharp and uncomfortable front bolsters.

Initially I wondered if these two knives were of a more recent vintage than my original pair, and perhaps Case had lately started making the Copperlock bolsters protrude more and with a sharper edge. In fact, the smooth chestnut Mini Copperlock is a 2012 model while the olive green one is 2017. But with the full size Copperlocks, the goldenrod is 2013 and the purple appaloosa is from 1998. So I guess the bolster shape is just an unpredictable feature from year-to-year and knife-to-knife.

Here’s a couple of pics showing the (stock) bolsters on my previous pair next to the sharper and more protruding ones on my new acquisitions. If the difference doesn’t appear huge, I can assure you there’s a big difference in how they feel in hand---my hand at least.

q8LwbHWl.jpg


RcEt6jnl.jpg


And here was my dilemma: the new pair were too uncomfortable to carry and use---but I liked them too much to sell. And I didn’t entirely trust myself to attempt another mod as I’m a complete amateur and this pair was just too nice to mess up.

So there they sat, and for way too long, until it finally sunk in: What good are they if I’m not going to use them? I decided to take the plunge.

Once again, I have no “before” pics. So please refer to the pics above from Mike which are a good representation of the stock blade shape which these had.

And here’s the result:

ZEVymKyl.jpg


2qQYaqnl.jpg


7stp6qFl.jpg


of0PwyAl.jpg


As you can see, this mod produced a different blade shape than my earlier one: a slightly fuller blade and a slightly stouter and less acute tip. But, as in the previous mod, the “hump” on the spine is gone.

This time, I also addressed the sharp front bolsters. With the sharp edges taken down, when the knives are closed the tang is not 100% covered. But almost, and in any event the tangs are rounded, as is typical with Case knives (and which I much prefer), so there’s no pocket snagging at all.

It has always interested me how a small tweak or two to a knife can greatly change how I feel about it. These most recent mods are no exception.

I realize that any modifications to the classic Copperlock pattern may be heresy to its many fans. But my take is simple---I now actually enjoy carrying and using these nice blades. After all, isn’t that the whole point?

Thanks for taking a look,

Andrew

Xo9Ewgrl.jpg

Nicely done.
 
Back
Top