I once saw a segment on a "Candid Camera"-type show where they set up a table at a sommelier's convention and filled 6 glasses with the same wine from the same bottle. They then put 6 different names and descriptions on the cards next to the glasses, and recorded what happened as the "experts" come by and rate the wine. They all gave varying descriptions and ratings to the same wine simply because they expected to find differences.
I think that this may relate to discussions of knife steels. There are plenty of reviews around here about how one steel performs compared to another and which is best for a particular situation and how 440 and AUS series are apparently not fit to be made into a bedpan, much less a knife. This is known as "steel snobbery".
I like good everyday steels like 440C and AUS-8, and I love simple carbon steels like O-1 and 1095. This is because they are simple and inexpensive and have never left me disappointed even under heavy use.
My question to you is do you think you could really tell the difference if the Super Hard "came from a meteorite" NASA-grade steel in your everyday folder was replaced with 440C or (gasp) 420HC? If you use your folder like most people do, I bet you couldn't.
Obviously if you are doing "extreme" testing like Cliff Stamp does there would be some clear differences, but consider the "performance envelope" of a general folder. Would S30V have any immediately discernable benefit in opening the mail or trimming loose strings?
I think that like the sommeliers on Candid Camera knifeknuts in general have over-hyped steel composition and metalurgy to the point that we are in many cases inventing differences where none are really present.
I think that this may relate to discussions of knife steels. There are plenty of reviews around here about how one steel performs compared to another and which is best for a particular situation and how 440 and AUS series are apparently not fit to be made into a bedpan, much less a knife. This is known as "steel snobbery".
I like good everyday steels like 440C and AUS-8, and I love simple carbon steels like O-1 and 1095. This is because they are simple and inexpensive and have never left me disappointed even under heavy use.
My question to you is do you think you could really tell the difference if the Super Hard "came from a meteorite" NASA-grade steel in your everyday folder was replaced with 440C or (gasp) 420HC? If you use your folder like most people do, I bet you couldn't.
Obviously if you are doing "extreme" testing like Cliff Stamp does there would be some clear differences, but consider the "performance envelope" of a general folder. Would S30V have any immediately discernable benefit in opening the mail or trimming loose strings?
I think that like the sommeliers on Candid Camera knifeknuts in general have over-hyped steel composition and metalurgy to the point that we are in many cases inventing differences where none are really present.