Inasmuch as "Emerson Knives" has addressed me personally in the above post, I feel it only proper to state my real name, Seth Rosen, rather than seem anonymous. I also should acknowledge that I've ordered three knives directly from Ernie - a Viper in June of 1995 (the bone of contention here) and two ES1s in November 1996. (The ES1s were delivered, almost a year apart within two years of ordering them). That's it: ordered three knives, got two so far. In and of itself, no reason to complain, that's for sure!
The rest of the story, which until now I've felt should be kept private, is: the Viper was promised within "6 to 8 months" by the Emersons in June '95; was again promised for delivery "by summer's end" in 1997; was again promised by "year's end" in '97; was then promised in summer of '98 " by September"; subsequently promised for delivery before March '99, and also "absolutely before [the order]is four year's old", meaning June '99. Each of these promises were spoken to me by Ernie personally or by telephone, and were in the context of monthly calls to check the status of the order. They were also in the context of great personal warmth and congeniality, and in each case I accepted his excuses pleasantly, operating under the assumption that my order would get filled in its turn.
All that changed in March of 2000, when I learned that orders placed after 6/95 for some contemporaneous models were being filled ahead of mine. I called to confirm it with Ernie, emailed to confirm it, wrote to him to confirm it - all without reply. Then I posted here to question and critize such a practice, and did get a call back from Ernie. Forty five minutes of apologia, excuses, and harsh critism later, only two things were resolved in what was a very confrontational phone call: 1, that we agreed to disagree on this practice, and 2, "you'll have your knife by summer's end". Direct quote. Nor has he returned any of my monthly calls since.
There is alot more to this that I don't think needs airing in public, and I invite Ernie to email or call me at his leisure. Or the person who posted the reply can call/email, rather than keeping this type of discussion in public. Especially references to the Guild, for heaven's sake! And, taking "responsibility" includes abiding by these promises, not merely mouthing a public mea culpa while continuing the activity, particularly while cast in the absurd shadow of "general consensus".
In any event, I look forward to the eventual delivery (here again publicly confirmed) of the Viper when it is made.
I apologize for such a lengthy post to my now long-suffering fellow Suspects.