- Joined
- Jun 6, 2002
- Messages
- 2,986
I have on order a Crawford Ti Kasper, the one with the bead blasted titanium skeletonized handle. Then, I went and changed the order to the same knife, but with blasted micarta slabes and blasted titanium bolsters.
They are both handsome looking knives, but I am waffling over the added thickness (1/8") of the micarta slabs versus the added purchase that the micarta might afford. I don't want to drive Pat Crawford crazy with changes and wind up getting a bad rep.
Are there owners of these knivesn that have opinions on feel and grip of the skeletonized handle over a micarta-covered handle? Should I be worried about the extra 1/8" thickness? (I mean, this is a hefty knife to begin with).
How about the perceptual value to potential buyers of either handle finish in the event I decide to sell this knife?
Thank you.
They are both handsome looking knives, but I am waffling over the added thickness (1/8") of the micarta slabs versus the added purchase that the micarta might afford. I don't want to drive Pat Crawford crazy with changes and wind up getting a bad rep.
Are there owners of these knivesn that have opinions on feel and grip of the skeletonized handle over a micarta-covered handle? Should I be worried about the extra 1/8" thickness? (I mean, this is a hefty knife to begin with).
How about the perceptual value to potential buyers of either handle finish in the event I decide to sell this knife?
Thank you.