The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
The design was arrived at using the clip point blade so I can't answer that question.Does it work with the Tanto blade as well?
Ah ok, thanks for replying!The design was arrived at using the clip point blade so I can't answer that question.
I would need a 1:1 CAD file of a tanto blade or the blade on hand to insure fitment/clearance.
Yep, that's how I have mine set up!I don't know if it'll help or hinder you, but the Zaan can use a body screw in the lanyard hole. CRK sells them from their website
That's a great option to have...!I don't know if it'll help or hinder you, but the Zaan can use a body screw in the lanyard hole. CRK sells them from their website
Do you make it in a glow material at all?
After evaluating the prototype design I've found this full length spacer which has a considerable cantilevered arm will flex at the pivot end. The forward end of the spacer will depress with finger/thumb pressure. There is NO potential breakage issue... it just flexes a bit.
My MKII design attempt to remedy this was to add beam depth creating additional stiffness however G10 still exhibits this slight depression flex even with this additional depth in the beam. Outside of shortening the back spacer to maybe half the arm length I don't see a fix.
I do not find this to be a huge negative. If you desire a FULL LENGTH back spacer for the Umnumzaan this slight flex is part and parcel... however I'm not certain how this with play in the CRK community.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()