- Joined
- Aug 9, 2007
- Messages
- 761
The first sharpener I ever owned was one of those eight-dollar Lansky devices. It had two tiny pieces of carbide and two pieces of ceramic, each angled together into a pair of shallow Vs that the edge of the knife was meant to be drawn through, thus (apparently) sharpening the knife.
I have since moved on. Now I own a sharpmaker, a Lansky clamp with stones of various grit, and even a couple of handstones as well. Depending mostly on the geometry of the knife I'm sharpening, these methods all produce slightly different results, but they are always consistently (and exponentially) better than those cross-carbide sharpeners.
The discussion that I'm trying to initiate, then, is about the true value of those devices. If they could produce proper results, then their size/speed/price would make them invaluable, but I've never seen it happen. Neither have most people, judging by the prevalence of other more complex, more expensive sharpening devices. A few of the younger, newer enthusiasts seem to think they're worth something, but so did I when I was a younger, newer, naive enthusiast. Perhaps they're just a noob novelty?
I've heard many experienced knuts condemn them, openly and blatantly.
I've had them recommended by the folks at Canadian Tire and various camping stores, who may or may not know what they're talking about. I'm skeptical.
Most significantly I've used them myself, and my opinion is that they are dangerous, thoughtless products that will ruin a knife more often than not.
Can't be sure though. Has anyone used these devices to proper effect? Is there perhaps a certain theatre (eg., kitchen knives) where they are more effective? It would be interesting to get a debate going on this.
I have since moved on. Now I own a sharpmaker, a Lansky clamp with stones of various grit, and even a couple of handstones as well. Depending mostly on the geometry of the knife I'm sharpening, these methods all produce slightly different results, but they are always consistently (and exponentially) better than those cross-carbide sharpeners.
The discussion that I'm trying to initiate, then, is about the true value of those devices. If they could produce proper results, then their size/speed/price would make them invaluable, but I've never seen it happen. Neither have most people, judging by the prevalence of other more complex, more expensive sharpening devices. A few of the younger, newer enthusiasts seem to think they're worth something, but so did I when I was a younger, newer, naive enthusiast. Perhaps they're just a noob novelty?
I've heard many experienced knuts condemn them, openly and blatantly.
I've had them recommended by the folks at Canadian Tire and various camping stores, who may or may not know what they're talking about. I'm skeptical.
Most significantly I've used them myself, and my opinion is that they are dangerous, thoughtless products that will ruin a knife more often than not.
Can't be sure though. Has anyone used these devices to proper effect? Is there perhaps a certain theatre (eg., kitchen knives) where they are more effective? It would be interesting to get a debate going on this.