CS Norse Hawk

Joined
Oct 23, 2003
Messages
582
I hear a lot about the CS Frontier Hawk & Trail hawk, a little less about the Rifleman Hawk, but very little about the Norse Hawk. With the extended blade design it looks like it would stick well and be a good thrower, but I hear almost nothing about it. So what's the deal? Is it not an effective design or is it just not esthetically pleasing or what? I have been considering getting one to throw and want ot make sure I choose the best Hawk for the buck

Thanks for all info,
 
The trail hawk. Expect the reason to be almost all about having the additional function of the hammer poll. The rifleman's hawk does too, but it looks not as nice. I see the frontier hawk discussed no more often than the norse hawk. But ultimately yes, bigger is better, practically speaking, except in peculiar instances.
 
One of the higher-ups at Cold Steel wrote an article which included praise for the flair on the upper side of the Norse head as further enabling hooking/tearing. :cool:
 
The norse hawk cannot split wood; which is the only grip I have with the ones I bought. The portion where the blade meets the haft is not conducive to wood spitting. They throw fine though, and are worth the price.

greg
 
I like the Norse hawk and have a few of them. They're more suited to fighting and less utilitarian than their other models, imho.
 
Norse hawks are growing on me (see hawk at far left).

IGH%20003.JPG


i have been putting them on my composite handles since brother adrenjunky got me interested in them.

i sharpened the tips on this one for sticking, on throws, etc.

....another thing i like about the Norse Hawk is it has machete-like characteristics too - whaddya know....

i like it, especially teamed up with one of the long hawks with a Trail Hawk head on it.

the Frontier Hawks are pretty nice too - i have one in my stable that is begging for mods....

the Frontier's such a nice-looking piece, geometrically - i am thinking about a composite handle that looks like rosewood - what do you brethren think...?

vec
 
that design will stick better, and is also a better blade shape for fighting (hooking, gouging, stabbing). I would like to get a couple.

I have and throw the rifleman hawk. I love it. Throws extremely well, and hits very hard. Decent for camping (I have a 30 inch handle if I need to really chop something hard), and a couple of 19 inch handles in my truck tool box all the time. I also have a special forces shovel, the pick handled poll ax, and the bad ax in my tool box of the truck too. (call me weird). It is, however a heavy beast. If you were having to pack it for a very long distance it would add weight to your pack.

IMG011-1.jpg

IMG013-1.jpg
 
So the Norse Hawk is the better thrower of CS Hawks, it is just not as functional for chopping / splitting as the rest of them. Is that the concensus?
 
So the Norse Hawk is the better thrower of CS Hawks, it is just not as functional for chopping / splitting as the rest of them. Is that the concensus?

i think the Rifleman's hawk is probably the best splitter, amongst the CS hawks.

it comes down to the right tool for the job though IMHO.

as i am sure you know, a hawk bit is usually shaped like a knife, instead of a wedge (axe), so you are going to trade that splitting functionality for not paying the weight penalty of lugging an axe or hatchet.



i like the Trail Hawk on a long handle, for instance, because i don't expect to be chopping anything bigger than my leg, and a long knife or machete batons great with the Trail Hawk helping out. - done deal, on the odd occasion i need to cord wood in the Wild.


The Norse Hawk is great for throwing potentially, especially with the points sharpened up a bit.

on my handles, or even without, i think the hawks can chop pretty dang good - splitting is the only drawback of a hawk i can think of, over an axe or similar head, and the hawks shine in all sorts of other ways, like odd angles on hillsides, etc., where i wouldn't want to be caught lugging or swinging an axe or hatchet.

YMMV.

vec
 
Seriously, don't even bother. They stick GREAT without being touched.

i hear ya brother, i just touch them up to just beyond a convex false edge, which might be nice in some fighting disciplines, and doesn't seem to dull with a few good tosses.

definitely overkill though, you are absolutely right IMHO.

it just refines the head a little.

i like overkill.

:cool:

vec
 
My Brother has a norse hawk and I've seen it in action. Its a good chopper and maintains its edge. as someone else said not a good splitter, blade is too thin and it buries deep and binds up in the wood. I cant really say about its throwing or sticking as we dont throw our edged tools. The Rifleman hawk is too heavy for me, it chops very well and the hammer poll has its uses even when deep in the bush but the weight prevents me from getting it stopped when and where I want,recovery from a stroke takes a lot of force. My fav is my renegade with a 16 inch oak handle, best compromise between a firewood chopper,a game quartering tool and a fast combat hawk.
 
Back
Top