Curtiss F3 vs. Olamic Wayfarer

Lost Cosmonaut

Lost Cosmonaut

Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
936
So I'm pretty certain I want one of these, I'm just not sure which. Heard nothing but good about both, and I like the looks of both a lot, but as much as I'd love to, I can't afford both (yet ;) )! So, if you had a choice, which would you get first?
 
Olamic Wayfarer if size matters :D I found the Curtiss to be on the small size for my hands. As a comparison the Curtiss is smaller than my Hinderer XM 3.5 given the same blade length.
 
1SHOT1KILL said:
Olamic Wayfarer if size matters :D I found the Curtiss to be on the small size for my hands. As a comparison the Curtiss is smaller than my Hinderer XM 3.5 given the same blade length.
Click to expand...

I do have bigger hands and prefer bigger blades. My 0561 is my favorite.
 
You could get the 4" curtiss f3, if you like the bigger knives. I have a 3.5" f3 and love it. Not to mention Dave is super awesome.
 
If you like the 0561 you will LOVE a Wayfarer. They are excellent pieces and very comfortable in the hand. I miss mine.
 
I've had both. I preferred the wayfarer. I didn't like the handle on the F3, it didn't fit my hand well. Olamic has the best customer service in the industry. Curtiss is also good on customer service. You really can't go wrong with either
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top