Based on our discussion to date it seems that the primary concern for knifemakers and collectors alike is that knives, manufactured by some other process, may be presented and sold as solely authored knives. We disagree on a specific definition, and hold different opinions on which factors should be weighted more heavily. But, we agree that makers have a clear responsibility for communicating honestly with their customers.
My suggestion would be that the Guild should publish an annual yearbook in which each member is profiled. Aside from contact information, a illustration of the logo they use, a small bio, and a couple of pictures of their knives; their production technique should be described in some detail. It would also include information on their average backlog, and whether they are open to producing customer generated designs, and a customer feedback rating [feedback cards would be delivered to customers with every knife - and the cards would be addressed care of the guild].
The information would come from the Guild members with the understanding that they may be subject to penalties, including possible ejection from the Guild, if they either fail to supply information or intentionally lie. It would be presented in a matter of fact form with no direct assignation on the handmade/custom/production issue. Each reader would be left to draw their own conclusions based on their own personal bias.
The whole package should be structured to have 1 page of information per each voting guild member, and made available on line and in CD-ROM.
This would provide a resource to ensure that we all have a clear understanding about how our knives were made; as well as, create a powerful marketing tool for the Guild members, and a valuable reference catalog for future collectors. The Guild would benefit from an added sense of purpose and the additional income.
N2S
