Cutting nail (size 16d) test

BluntCut MetalWorks

Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
3,462
Specs: 52100 super quenched; 3/32" thick; 61rc; sharpened 15dps with 0.015" - 0.018" (0.38-0.46mm) behind edge thickness.

Test: cut size-16d nail 4 times.

Result - Extend of damage:
* cut 1 & 2 - apex radius flattened to 0.006"
* cut 3 & 4 (next to each other) - apex radius flattened to 0.008", sign of rippled at thickness 0.012" but should sharpen out at thickness 0.009"

Thanks for watching & comments.

http://youtu.be/krE3nd6OiQs


edited: for accuracy, title changed 'chopping' to 'cutting'
 
Last edited:
Great test! Thank you! I am curious, have you done this testing on other steels? It would be very interesting to see a comparison of performance of steels with different compositions at different hardness.
 
It's inspired by bodog's test on his ZT, but I agree, there is need to have 'standard' blade as comparison.

Still, an extremely tough blade I'd say. :cool:
 
Impressive, sir. Do you put knives up for sale anywhere? I can't find a website and I don't remember seeing anything here (Shameless plug opportunity).

I hope you don't mind but I copied and pasted your post into into the bladesmith talk section. I think some other bladesmiths would be curious to learn about what you're doing. Or they should be curious, anyway.

And link to the other thread referenced:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1305088-ZT-0180-Hard-Use/page2

And to the knifemakers' discussion thread:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1309221-Bluntcut-Metalworks-52100
 
Last edited:
Chris "Anagarika";15013695 said:
It's inspired by bodog's test on his ZT, but I agree, there is need to have 'standard' blade as comparison.

Still, an extremely tough blade I'd say. :cool:

Yeah, I'd like to see something like 3V at the same thickness with a standard heat treat, 52100 at the same thickness with a standard heat treat, and something like 154cm at the same thickness with a standard heat treat. That's a pretty thin blade taking some pretty heavy shocks and blunting forces with very minimal damage.
 
Thanks Chris!

After done various abuse tests (cinder block, rock, buloke wood, etc..), I found cutting nail is the most destructive among them. Edge in contact with nail small diameter translate into very large psi. Most of the impact force will be perpendicular and some lateral.

Here is my quick calculation
Striking force: Look like at least 40-80 lbs (wild guess here, basically it's a 8" jab - and I am very sure don't want to get pounds with it) hit from log to blade spine
Contact area: 0.165" nail shank/dia, 0.006" blade cross section (blunted depth)

PSI = ~60/(0.165 * 0.006) = ~ 61K lb/sq_inch * note: UTS of a36 steel is 58K psi source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pounds_per_square_inch *


Chris "Anagarika";15013695 said:
It's inspired by bodog's test on his ZT, but I agree, there is need to have 'standard' blade as comparison.

Still, an extremely tough blade I'd say. :cool:

Thanks Bodog!

Early on, I newb-posted a few SQ(super quench) related threads in KMGD subforum, :foot: in my mumbling mouth might have dug a sizable hole in my credibility. Unless there is a far-out (like hammer & tong) folder, SQ may lead to confusion for new comers and could be a distraction for Pro.

Actually, I appreciate you cross-posted thread for discussion. It's of value to know SQ is possible. Good to have an alternative way to ht, doesn't mean it's practical for most hters.
Impressive, sir. Do you put knives up for sale anywhere? I can't find a website and I don't remember seeing anything here (Shameless plug opportunity).

I hope you don't mind but I copied and pasted your post into into the bladesmith talk section. I think some other bladesmiths would be curious to learn about what you're doing. Or they should be curious, anyway.

And link to the other thread referenced:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1305088-ZT-0180-Hard-Use/page2

And to the knifemakers' discussion thread:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1309221-Bluntcut-Metalworks-52100
 
Thanks Lance!

I haven't test much with production knives. Only recalled 2 memorable instances
1. Spyderco Stretch zdp-189 with very thin edge cut sadine can - loss about 3mm edge depth
2. Benchmade Pardue D2 5" fixed-blade thin edge - loss 4mm edge chop green palm frond

While my early heat-treated blades in many steels (used std ht params as baseline for comparison). Cutting 3/16 brass rod with 15dps thin edge (0.015 - 0.03 thick) were disastrous 1-4mm chipped and or rolled. That was before I've a hardness tester and hardness of these blades were probably 61-64rc. After hardness tester and I am get better with ht. Keeping hardness to around 60rc for high alloy, would reduce damage to around 1.5mm (for baseline & mine). Sometime mine experimental ht would chipped 3-8mm deep (quite wide - semi circle shape).

For given edge geometry of 15dps, 0.015" thick and task to cut 16d nail. Use whatever optimal (strength+toughness) for particular steel.
Yes, it would be interesting to see results std ht vs SQ ht.

I've a few std ht 52100 & few slightly modified std ht 52100 blades, I might put through this test. Also have baseline knives ~62rc in cpm-m4, s90v, s110v, cpm154, 20cv, elmax, many D2, M2, aeb-l, 14C28N, rex121, w2, 10xx, 5160, etc... Probably better if I make crude test blade for cutting-nail test than possibly destroy my baseline knives (w/ nice handle).

I've 3V but very thin bars (0.05" thick), not fit for this test.

Nathan's 3V at 60rc (20dps, 0.02" thick before sharpening) did great in cut 16d nail.

Great test! Thank you! I am curious, have you done this testing on other steels? It would be very interesting to see a comparison of performance of steels with different compositions at different hardness.

Yeah, I'd like to see something like 3V at the same thickness with a standard heat treat, 52100 at the same thickness with a standard heat treat, and something like 154cm at the same thickness with a standard heat treat. That's a pretty thin blade taking some pretty heavy shocks and blunting forces with very minimal damage.

Further more, cutting nail best suited edge with high strength and high toughness. Else, too soft = big deformation, brittle = big chip. From Charpy & Izod #s for various steels, we can sort of infer that nail cutting is not a friend of your edge.

D2 is one of the steel has lowest toughness # (rex121, cpm125v, are worse). I will make test SQ D2 61+rc blades (0.13" thick; 15dps; 0.015" edge thick). Use this result to interpolate other SQ ht steels. For comparision, I will throw in Benchmade Pardue Fixed D2 as a baseline blade.

All, please keep in mind. This thread/discussion is about testing steel limits, which is far remove from practical/reality edge tools usage. :thumbup:

edit to add:
i) Bodog, this knife is a different one than the previous one. I over heated the edge of that one when I was distracted while lazily hollow grinding the bevel with an 8" wheel.
ii) Shameless plug: PM/email me - End date of 'Muc', get one time rain-check 33% off knives - good through 20160229:cool::D
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the headup Bodog! Look like Dan W rectified the QC issue.

For my ht. Instead of ability to cut nail, could trade that in for even more strength (1 or 2 RC in hardness) -> get extra wear resistance, while toughness is still plenty high for hard uses (below nail cutting level).


Thanks. My ht produces good result for low(or none) Chromium/Mo/Co steels. Am still struggling to produce ultra fine grain for mid to high Cr/Mo/Co steels.
Bluntcut, impressive. You obviously have 52100 down.
 
Thanks for the headup Bodog! Look like Dan W rectified the QC issue.

For my ht. Instead of ability to cut nail, could trade that in for even more strength (1 or 2 RC in hardness) -> get extra wear resistance, while toughness is still plenty high for hard uses (below nail cutting level).



Thanks. My ht produces good result for low(or none) Chromium/Mo/Co steels. Am still struggling to produce ultra fine grain for mid to high Cr/Mo/Co steels.

I have no doubt you will get there.
 
Back
Top