- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 62
I don't know a great deal about knife steel, and I am particularly confused about D2. On another forum (BCUSA), the following information was posted:
"D2 is a tool steel that is just outside of the threshold of being a carbon steel so it is sort of neither carbon nor stainless really it has more resistance to rust than 1095 but less than 410. Generally it is not used with large blades as it can chip out in aplications like a machete but it is considered a good choice for small to medium sized blades and will take abuse as well as hold an edge."
That is helpful information for me, but I still have a few questions: How would D2 compare to, say, 440C in terms of its ability to resist chipping? Is it correct to say that 440C would be more brittle than D2, which would in turn be more brittle than 1095?
I am asking because I'm on the never-ending search for the "perfect" backpacking knife. I'm nervous about 1095 for a multiday trip, since it can't necessarily be dried off, oiled, and put away at the end of the day while on the trail. On the other hand, I do a fair bit of batoning, and I want to make VERY sure that my knife steel is up to the challenge and that I won't have to fear chipping. In particular, I already have the BK-11 and the Eskabar in 1095, and am intrigued by the BK-24 (i.e., the Eskabar in D2 steel), but I'm not sure if it would hold up to long-term, hard batoning. I know that Moose has already done some testing of the BK-24, and it seemed to do just fine, but I'm still trying to gather more information. As an alternative, Esee is of course coming out with stainless (440C) versions of the Izula and the 4 this year. I'm sure they'll be great, but I like the intermediate size of the Eskabar/BK-24.
Any help you all can provide would be greatly appreciated!
"D2 is a tool steel that is just outside of the threshold of being a carbon steel so it is sort of neither carbon nor stainless really it has more resistance to rust than 1095 but less than 410. Generally it is not used with large blades as it can chip out in aplications like a machete but it is considered a good choice for small to medium sized blades and will take abuse as well as hold an edge."
That is helpful information for me, but I still have a few questions: How would D2 compare to, say, 440C in terms of its ability to resist chipping? Is it correct to say that 440C would be more brittle than D2, which would in turn be more brittle than 1095?
I am asking because I'm on the never-ending search for the "perfect" backpacking knife. I'm nervous about 1095 for a multiday trip, since it can't necessarily be dried off, oiled, and put away at the end of the day while on the trail. On the other hand, I do a fair bit of batoning, and I want to make VERY sure that my knife steel is up to the challenge and that I won't have to fear chipping. In particular, I already have the BK-11 and the Eskabar in 1095, and am intrigued by the BK-24 (i.e., the Eskabar in D2 steel), but I'm not sure if it would hold up to long-term, hard batoning. I know that Moose has already done some testing of the BK-24, and it seemed to do just fine, but I'm still trying to gather more information. As an alternative, Esee is of course coming out with stainless (440C) versions of the Izula and the 4 this year. I'm sure they'll be great, but I like the intermediate size of the Eskabar/BK-24.
Any help you all can provide would be greatly appreciated!