There is an inherent flaw in this discussion that has yet to be addressed, although with Deker and Delbert present it should only be a matter of time. It is a shortcoming in our field to conceptualize "damascus" as a separate steel type as if it was singular, i.e. "I use, O-1, 1095, W2 and damascus." Damascus is not an alloy designation it is a process that uses those common steels, and as such there is no singular damascus steel but infinite combinations of steels in the process of pattern welding.
"O.K. Kevin, so what is the big deal" you are probably asking. Well it makes for a lot of confusion in describing methods of working with the materials. Tell a person to heat treat 15n20/1095 like it was O-1/L6 and there will be problems. You even get well established makers saying ridiculous things like "damascus doesn't cut like...", "damascus needs this kind of quench", "damascus is...etc...", none of which makes any sense. But if you switch to the steels used in the process- "W2/15n20, needs a faster quench than O-1/L6" it all suddenly makes perfect sense.
If both buyers and makers approached the topic in this way, communication about steel combinations, heat treatment and end use would all improve greatly. I have seen alloy combinations used that were probably the result of thinking that whatever went into the billet would just turn into this special material called "damascus" in the end, when in fact we still have to deal with the individual alloying that were combined.
tonycap, your best approach is to find a damascus maker, some excellent ones here already, and discuss the alloys used in their mixes versus your applications, and that will determine how you should work with the product. If you are already familiar with O-1 that could be a good starting point in choosing your combination.