aaron:
I apologize if I came off as a know-it-all. We all have to start learning somewhere.
Saying that Damascus is all good or all bad (or all for show or all for performance) is like saying all cuts of one type of wood is better than all cuts of another.
While the arguments between woods have more to do with mother nature (there are
many variants of walnut for instance, and not every piece of French walnut is better than every piece of American Black walnut), the "worth" of damascus depends on a lot of variables. These include, but are not limited to, the base materials used, the technique in fabricating the raw material, the technique used in heat treatment, and the skill of the craftsman.
Like "walnut", someone can start out with a superior billet of damascus and end up with a less than desirable product.
We are fortunate in that we now have available a wide variety of damascus blade steels available - ranging from basic carbon tool steels welded together with sweat, hammer, and anvil to high-performance san-mai patterns, to billets that incoporate powdered metallurgy and vacuum melt technology.
While it is true that, to the casual observer, (aesthetically) the beauty of damascus might only be skin deep, the true beauty lies within its unique construction and celebrated history. We should also keep in mind that outstanding beauty
and performace are consistantly being achieved by the hands of many of today's skilled makers.