I really like that 10" BDC. I have a short ultra light camping trip planned for later this summer, and a knife big enough to chop, strong enough to pry, sharp enough to slice, and light enough to pack would be very welcome. I've tried this with my Kerambit, but it's TOO curvy.
I'm interested in these thoughts of yours about the 10" BDC. A neat knife--though it really does look kind of like a pistol on the belt, for whatever that's worth. I'm interested in hearing about how people who use these use them.
One thing I'm thinking it might be good to do is to do a comparison chopping field test, using knives not ordinarily regarded as choppers. Say a USMC Ka-bar, a Mora 2000, an Ontario Old Hickory with, say, a 6-inch blade, maybe a Himalayan Imports bilton, maybe an Ontario or Camillus Pilot's Survival Knife. And, maybe, a 10-inch BDC. Again, the idea would be to see how they all did in cutting through, say, a 3-or-4-inch-thick hardwood log.
My theory is that they'd all do fine, and that, though it'd take you a considerable period of time--maybe 2 or 3 or 4 times as long as it'd take you with a real, certified chopping knife, you'd still get through, just taking smaller chips out of the wood. I'm very mindful of the fact that the stone axes the paleo-Indians used around here were probably used to peck/chew away at wood, and I've tried using this technique, and been surprised at how quickly one can get through wood that way. I mean, you're not going to outdo a real, modern hatchet or chopping knife, but it is a doable task.
If this theory is borne out, it would suggest that, unless your contemplated wilderness situation involves chopping down and processing many trees, you really might do just fine with a medium or even short blade, especially if it has enough width/weight to make a decent chop. I mean, I don't see a standard, wood-handled 4-inch Mora doing chopping-like work without a baton, but I imagine the other knives named above would get you there, with patience.