Deep Survival: Who Lives, Who Dies, and Why [a tribute to his father]

Joined
Jun 16, 2003
Messages
20,206
Finally got a copy of Gonzales' book - for $.10 at a library book sale.

A book about, I guess, the philosphy of survival by a reporter who wants to understand his dad.

I am mystified.

Seems internally contradictory when it isn't vague as smoke.''

Some good tales of survival.

How do you rate it?
 
I've read it multiple times,(mostly just different chapters) I like it, I think it's a great book and well written.

I've given away 3/three copies in the past 5/five years to people that need to read it, mostly people I worked with or friends in the same line of work.
 
He makes some good points. He is at his best telling his stories of survival. But you also run into statements like:

Those who can control that urge to survive, live. Those who do can't, die.

"That urge" being an irrational, emotional urge to do something that kills you under the circumstance. Well, duh!

When a patient is told that he has six months to live, he has two choices: to accept the news and die, or to rebel and live.

- or get a second opinion

- or rebel and die

- or accept and they save you anyway.

Then we go into nature, where we are least among equals with all other creatures.

Really? Amazing that Homo sap. survived at the bottom of the survival ladder.

[In combat] . . . only my not being there is going to prevent [my death]

Nevertheless, millions have survived to the end of their respectrive wars. I had four uncles in combat in WWII. One died. One was wounded. Two survived unscathed. Other factors caused death or survival, such as a well-aimed torpedo, good medical care, skill, luck, or . . . ..

Plan for everything to take eight times as long as you expect it to take.

Just how does that work in reality? Plan to fail so you always meet plan goals?

EVERYONE WHO dies out there dies of confusion.

You can't interview the dead. How do you know 100% were confused? 25% die of heart attacks.

One of the many baffling mysteries concerns who survives and who doesn't

"Concerns"? Does he mean the mystery is "why some die and some survive"?

"Is"? If it IS baffling mystery, why are we buying his book?

The Boy Scouts in its original conception was a survival school.

The Boy Scouts in its original conception was a school for citizenship and character. We know this because the guy who started Boy Scouting repeatedly said exacty what it was intended it to be.

The Stoics are the best survival instructors.

Stoicism may be a good philosophy for survival, but . . .

If he'd though of death, he might not have bothered [to make the effort to live]. . ..
The certainty of death suddenly energised Simpson.

Same guy. Same survival tale.

To revere pain and fear, to embrace friction, are bedrock skills of survival.

At least sadism and survival both begin with an "S."

Sure, it takes luck to be a survivor.
Nothing can truly be said to happen by chance.

[E]verything, good and bad, eminates from within.

Deep. Very deep.

Be bold and cautious.
e very careful.


Funny that he spends so much space talking about pilots. Uncle Harold, shot down three times in POS P-39's and an Ace+2 in a P-38, a test pilot after WWII, had a little sign on his desk; "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots."

[Survivors]... believe anything is possible and act accordingly.

Survivors don't expect or even hope to be rescued

You're already flying upside down.
That is, every day for everyone is equally a survival situation.
 
Last edited:
I read it a few years ago and I liked it and it made alot of sense. It was nice to find out I was doing alot of the right things by instinct without even knowing it. The part about the song lines and having a mantra rings true in many survival situations. One time I saw a mental image of this unusual knot in a tree along the trail. On the way back I missed a turn and ended up off trail. When I found my way back to the unusual knot I knew I was on the right track. It was a good feeling.

While I'm not a critic I thought it was a good and worthwhile read.
 
Back
Top