Or why does the 18" GS look completely different from the 21" GS?
Well, my HIKV has been very active, and I've bitten at a couple of Pala's give aways. The result has been two skinny packages in the last two weeks. One contained an 18" GS by Bura. The other contained a 21" GS marked with the Nepali flag (Kesar? Durba?). Anyway, when I removed the larger GS from its scabbard, I noticed right away that it was radically different from the 18"er.
Yes, they have the forged fuller/recess on both sides of the blade, plus the same heart-shaped cho. But the blade-shape of the Bura GS is essentially that of a Kobra, with virtually no "belly" and a Kobra-style point. It feels and moves like a Kobra, too.
The large blade is essentially a Sirupati, with the same curves in the same places. Not surprisingly, it also swings like a Sirupati.
My question is how did the two kamis come up with such different interpretations of the same knife? Variations are understandable in hand-forged blades. But the two smiths clearly had very different visions in mind when they made these knives. Has anyone else come across this phenomenon? Are some of the kamis more prone to making a given blade shape regardless of what variety the khuk happens to be?
S.
Well, my HIKV has been very active, and I've bitten at a couple of Pala's give aways. The result has been two skinny packages in the last two weeks. One contained an 18" GS by Bura. The other contained a 21" GS marked with the Nepali flag (Kesar? Durba?). Anyway, when I removed the larger GS from its scabbard, I noticed right away that it was radically different from the 18"er.
Yes, they have the forged fuller/recess on both sides of the blade, plus the same heart-shaped cho. But the blade-shape of the Bura GS is essentially that of a Kobra, with virtually no "belly" and a Kobra-style point. It feels and moves like a Kobra, too.
The large blade is essentially a Sirupati, with the same curves in the same places. Not surprisingly, it also swings like a Sirupati.
My question is how did the two kamis come up with such different interpretations of the same knife? Variations are understandable in hand-forged blades. But the two smiths clearly had very different visions in mind when they made these knives. Has anyone else come across this phenomenon? Are some of the kamis more prone to making a given blade shape regardless of what variety the khuk happens to be?
S.