Disc grinder or mill fly cutter for surface grinding?

Joined
Oct 24, 2020
Messages
31
If these were your only options for surface grinding, which would be more accurate if I was going to hand sand on a granite surface plate after?
 
That very much depends on the rigidity of the mill you'll be fly cutting with. Sloppy spindle bearings and gibs/ways will make for a lot of sanding. And don't try to hard machine with a fly cutter...

You can get fairly accurate flatness, parallelism on a disc grinder with practice and patience. If you need real accuracy a surface grinder is the correct option
 
That very much depends on the rigidity of the mill you'll be fly cutting with. Sloppy spindle bearings and gibs/ways will make for a lot of sanding. And don't try to hard machine with a fly cutter...

You can get fairly accurate flatness, parallelism on a disc grinder with practice and patience. If you need real accuracy a surface grinder is the correct option
Got it, so a disc grinder would be better for heat-treated steel?
 
I use my glass platen on the 2x72 to start with and do light touch up on the disc and always finish on a granite block.

I just could not get the accuracy I wanted solely using the disc grinder.
 
I tried a fly cutter on my tormach on blade steel and it did not work well. It was a rough cut, I think lots of flex and chatter. If you spent time refining speed/feed and depth maybe you could find something that works. A 1/4” end mill works far better, leaving a finish that you can easily sand out, but it’s slow. You can take off material faster than a disc I’d imagine.
 
Actually, fly cutters are pretty lame. I would recommend a decent face mill and just use a single insert. It works way better, trust me. But I still wouldn't recommend that on hardened steel.
been planning on get one one of these days likely 2 or 2.5 inch im thinking depending on the cutterr style 3 inch woudl be too much for my bridgeport
 
Actually, fly cutters are pretty lame. I would recommend a decent face mill and just use a single insert. It works way better, trust me. But I still wouldn't recommend that on hardened steel.
Is there a reason not to use all the inserts? You have me curious now!
 
Is there a reason not to use all the inserts? You have me curious now!
The inserts will have slightly different depths and diameters and will also have higher horsepower and rigidity needs. It is slow, but you will get your best finish with a single insert and you won't overwhelm a small machine with just one.

20180718_171411.jpg20180717_095728.jpg20180521_145911.jpg20180717_102254.jpg


.005" death of cut and feed per revolution is a pretty good starting place for a finish cut
 

Attachments

  • 20180706_104057.jpg
    20180706_104057.jpg
    274.3 KB · Views: 3
The inserts will have slightly different depths and diameters and will also have higher horsepower and rigidity needs. It is slow, but you will get your best finish with a single insert and you won't overwhelm a small machine with just one.

View attachment 1934310View attachment 1934309View attachment 1934306View attachment 1934308


.005" death of cut and feed per revolution is a pretty good starting place for a finish cut
Nice, thanks for the explanation! I never thought about only using one.
 
Back
Top