- Joined
- Nov 5, 2016
- Messages
- 378
First is it a disc sander or a disc grinder? Darn hard to search for info because different folks like to use a different name, anyways real questions:
I’m just a hobbyist maker. So far I just give away anything I make, making this hobby a one way money equation. My shop space consists of the back patio (currently 25 degrees outside) where I forge and a corner of the basement for tools. So space and $ are limited for this hobby. After forging, if I want a clean finish rather than brute de forge, flattening things on my little 1x42 with not so awesome tracking and a less than truly flat platen isn’t amazing. I know a real 2x72 with a legit platen would do a better job than my 1x42 and be a versatile tool, but that whole money space thing. I have been reading up on disc grinders, and it seems one could be the ticket for getting nice clean flats with less $ and space committed than a 2x72. I’ve also watched Nick Wheeler’s videos where he finish grinds his bevels on a disc. In searching I’ve found plenty of folks discussing doing the same. I haven’t really found discussions on if you could do more than just the finish grinding. Given that I forge every blade to shape and forge in bevels typically, would it be realistic to do all of my grinding on the disc instead of just finish work? That would let me delegate my 1x42 to handle work where it seems to do better than blade work and at least hold off a while longer on worrying about a 2x72.
If I do take the plunge with a disc grinder, reversing sounds to be a requirement. A 9” disc to use sheets also sounds to be the ticket. Is variable speed essentially a requirement as well or only in the nice to have column? When it comes to power what should the minimum be? It appears many have used 1hp motors, but trugrit sells down to a 1/3hp. The common thing I’ve seen for 2x72 is no less than 1hp, but I can’t figure out if the same holds true for a disc. And the final question, flat or beveled disc? Flat seems like it would be better for, you know, getting things flat. On USA knife maker they claim the bevel is so small it’s flatter than a human can manage anyways. Truth to that? If going with a truly flat, just how big of an issue is it for the end of the blade to be catching the up spinning side of the disc?
Sorry for all of the questions. Did my best to read through the old threads and managed mostly to confuse myself, so I figured I’d try putting it all together in one place.
I’m just a hobbyist maker. So far I just give away anything I make, making this hobby a one way money equation. My shop space consists of the back patio (currently 25 degrees outside) where I forge and a corner of the basement for tools. So space and $ are limited for this hobby. After forging, if I want a clean finish rather than brute de forge, flattening things on my little 1x42 with not so awesome tracking and a less than truly flat platen isn’t amazing. I know a real 2x72 with a legit platen would do a better job than my 1x42 and be a versatile tool, but that whole money space thing. I have been reading up on disc grinders, and it seems one could be the ticket for getting nice clean flats with less $ and space committed than a 2x72. I’ve also watched Nick Wheeler’s videos where he finish grinds his bevels on a disc. In searching I’ve found plenty of folks discussing doing the same. I haven’t really found discussions on if you could do more than just the finish grinding. Given that I forge every blade to shape and forge in bevels typically, would it be realistic to do all of my grinding on the disc instead of just finish work? That would let me delegate my 1x42 to handle work where it seems to do better than blade work and at least hold off a while longer on worrying about a 2x72.
If I do take the plunge with a disc grinder, reversing sounds to be a requirement. A 9” disc to use sheets also sounds to be the ticket. Is variable speed essentially a requirement as well or only in the nice to have column? When it comes to power what should the minimum be? It appears many have used 1hp motors, but trugrit sells down to a 1/3hp. The common thing I’ve seen for 2x72 is no less than 1hp, but I can’t figure out if the same holds true for a disc. And the final question, flat or beveled disc? Flat seems like it would be better for, you know, getting things flat. On USA knife maker they claim the bevel is so small it’s flatter than a human can manage anyways. Truth to that? If going with a truly flat, just how big of an issue is it for the end of the blade to be catching the up spinning side of the disc?
Sorry for all of the questions. Did my best to read through the old threads and managed mostly to confuse myself, so I figured I’d try putting it all together in one place.