Discussion Title Is All Wrong

[J. D. Martin]

Webmaster, I am just now learning how resourceful your software is, all the things it can do. But one step was not so clear. You have a title "General Knife Discussion," and after that "Blade Discussion Forum." Both titles, and the 3-sentence 'explanation' under each, seem non-descriptive/non-explanatory. I had NO idea, when I clicked on "General Knive Discussion," that the heading hid
a list of 6 or 7 extremely specific subheads on autos, throwing knifes, etc. I hadn't a clue from the featureless title "General Knife Discussion." I thought maybe, under that heading, we would dispense with the 'specifics'; ours would be a purely 'general' discussion, perhaps encompassing: 'A Kantian Theory of Knives'; 'Loveless and His Theory of Justice'; 'A Rule-Utilitarian Approach to Blade design: Drop-points, Spear-points and Their Progeny';like that, and other such fascinating, indisputably 'General,' topics.
--- JDM:yawn:

 

[Gollnick]

We also have a forum called "Service and Support" for ideas for improving the site. This should go there.

 

[Bastid]

An excellent idea sir and off we go.


Another thought is to consider the General Heading to mean General Knife Discussion Forums as opposted to Community, Makers/Mfgs, Tactics & Training and Exchange. The length of word General fits pretty well .