DMT Coarse Benchstone Review

Joined
May 28, 1999
Messages
2,606
Was debating whether to put this here or in the reviews section, figured it would be most pertinent here, mods can feel free to move it though.

This is a review of DMT's 325 mesh coarse diamond benchstone, 6 inch model, with the perforations.

Finally decided to actually buy one of DMT's coase stones, previously I had only owned their ultrafine. I needed something as a pre-1000 grit waterstone step and also for extra aggressive edges. I ususally use a cheap carbide stone for this, but I've also been wanting something to flatten my waterstones out, so this was a perfect opportunity.

Out of the box the DMT stone was quite nice, no obvious defects, and included a pretty nice wooden holder with rubber feet. On closer inspection the diamond coating is a little (hardly noticable) at the very end of one side, and you can see electroplating marks or something there, I don't see it affecting the performance of the stone at all so I won't complain.

The grit appears to be almost perfectly uniform, and testing on the flat of a chisel shows a nice even scratch pattern. It appears to remove material at least 2x faster than my 1000 grit shapton, although it's too early to make a judgement at this point. DMT (and all diamond stones to a greater or lesser extent) smooth out a little after the first few knives, then keep that level of agressiveness for most of their life.

I haven't had a chance to use it to flatten my waterstones yet, nor do any serious knife sharpening, but I'll update as soon as I do.

Edit/mini-update: I forgot to add originally, the polycarbonate stone base isn't actually solid, it's hollow, with reinforcing ribs going down the length. I'd estimate the top is a full 1/4 inch thick, with ribs providing rigidity. The polycarbonate material reminds me alot of the Camillus Becker handles, very hard, and makes almost a glasslike sound when tapped, I say almost because the camillus scales ring just like glass would.
 
do you have a continuous surface diasharp to compare to? I'm trying to decide on a two sided DMT in C/XC-looking at both the interrupted 8" duo-sharp and the new double sided 6" diasharp.
 
No, but if you want my opinion unless all you're gonna be doing is sharpening chisels or flattening stones, get the continuous surface diasharp. It's cheaper than the equivalent plastic stone, you get more grit/your dollar, and they're less prone to damage (dmt even says that if you have very curved edges or fine tools to sharpen, they can "dip" into the perforations a bit and damage the plated surface, I've seen this to a limited extent on my ultrafine stone.) IMO it's a superior stone in all the important aspects. Try to get the biggest stone you can handle as well, you seem to already know this, but I prefer stones at least 8 inchs long. 6 is fine for folders and smaller fixed blades, but with an 8 inch or bigger stone I can handle almost any knife up to 10 inches long with ease.

Edited to add: The continuous surface also feels way better during sharpening, when you hit the belly of the blade you can feel the edge going in and out of the perforations, which can really mess up your sharpening stroke if you go by feel like me, I can also imagine it isn't terribly good for the edge in that part either.
 
hmm, I was worried the perforations wouldn't have a good feel. 6" is a good length for me, as I do most work with folders, and on longer blades I sharpen in sections. Even with short blades, I prefer to do the point, belly and straight portions on separate strokes. Thanks for the impressions, I was mainly looking at the perforated just because it's more available, but I'll focus on the continuous.
 
I have the DMT coarse (Blue) stone, and I've used it to re-bevel (we're not supposed to say re-profile any more, so picture me PC) 5 or 6 blades.

The only 'problem' is that, at high honing pressure, the perforations can leave a scalloped/grooved scratch pattern on the bevels. That pattern requires some effort to remove on harder steel blade bevels.

If I buy another DMT diamond hone, it'll be a diasharp.
 
Just bought a Duosharp F/C 8" and love it. Reprofiled and put a finished edge on a Native in S30V in under 20 minutes, also did a few others with similar success.

Less hard steels went even faster (H1 in about 5 minutes, 8a and 154cm even less).

Would recommend it very hightly.

Discontinuous surface not an issue if your not leaning into the stone for massive stock removal.

Would not have wanted to go smaller because I can flip it 180 deg. and get a clean surface; shortens sharpening time dramatically because of reduced cleaning as the stone loads with steel. Paid $78 for it and worth every dime. :D
 
gud4u said:
...we're not supposed to say re-profile any more...
RE-PROFILE, RE-PROFILE, RE-PROFILE!

Phew! Now that I've got that out of my system, I've got Diasharps in coarse and xxcoarse, and Smith's holy hones in coarse and fine. I definately prefer the continuous surface hone to the holy hones.

Mark
 
gud4u said:
we're not supposed to say re-profile any more

There's more than one profile. The edge profile and the overall shape of the knife (drop, wharnie, clip, hawkbill, recurve). Changing either and stating you've reprofiled is correct. Unless I'm the one saying it and the one complaining is Bill. Then it's wrong.

Nice review, Yoda!
 
Back
Top