jftman
Gold Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 520
I have what is considered a first version 5172 Clasp made by Case knives between 40-64
The blade marking are Front Large CASE (can't) see XX under bolster.
Backside Tang Large 5172. Back blade etch is two lines HAND MADE then IN U.S.A.
The shield is pinned and has a tall open S rather than a shorten flat curved S top n bottom.
But..... The stag is pretty fat on both sides.
Looks to be a full inch and a hair more (1/32) give or take.
So I have handled other later model fat and thinner 1-3rd version original Bulldog
Stag handles.
Is Fat cool regardless?
Blade tang imprint on inside back spring looks one lined and crisp,
I don't see any evidence that the knife has been apart.
[/IMG]
Do I have a "lunch box" Case employee walk out from the early era? Hand pic'd stag?
Should we Bulldog buyers think Fat Stag is wrong on such a knife?
[/IMG]
Next to a Hinderer XM-18
The blade marking are Front Large CASE (can't) see XX under bolster.
Backside Tang Large 5172. Back blade etch is two lines HAND MADE then IN U.S.A.
The shield is pinned and has a tall open S rather than a shorten flat curved S top n bottom.
But..... The stag is pretty fat on both sides.
Looks to be a full inch and a hair more (1/32) give or take.
So I have handled other later model fat and thinner 1-3rd version original Bulldog
Stag handles.
Is Fat cool regardless?
Blade tang imprint on inside back spring looks one lined and crisp,
I don't see any evidence that the knife has been apart.

Do I have a "lunch box" Case employee walk out from the early era? Hand pic'd stag?
Should we Bulldog buyers think Fat Stag is wrong on such a knife?

Next to a Hinderer XM-18
Last edited: