Do you ever feel that some struggle to find fault with certain knives, no matter their actual quality of build or the actual quality of materials that went into them?
Probably the most obvious is discounting some good, even great knives because of where they are made. Today it's China, India and Pakistan. Before that it was Taiwan, and before that it was Japan. In each case there were grave reason for concern at the beginning of their respective productions. But in each case, the attacks continued (or continue) long after being universally warranted.
Some attack certain knives if they aren't made from the latest (and most expensive) whiz-bang steel available. If it's not made from CPM 3-V (or something even more expensive), it's necessarily garbage to them.
In other cases some will judge a knife harshly because its design is influenced by a classical design originating from another knife maker (I'm not talking about clones.)
Knives aren't (comparatively) high-tech products. They also aren't extremely complicated machines, nor does each one take a great deal of material or space-age processes to build. Unlike firearms they're also not tightly controlled by laws and trade restrictions.
Ultimately it seems like some are programmed to attack good, even excellent knives because of their low sales price. They're unable to recognize the value such knives represent, so they go searching for a "reason" to judge them as being junk.
Probably the most obvious is discounting some good, even great knives because of where they are made. Today it's China, India and Pakistan. Before that it was Taiwan, and before that it was Japan. In each case there were grave reason for concern at the beginning of their respective productions. But in each case, the attacks continued (or continue) long after being universally warranted.
Some attack certain knives if they aren't made from the latest (and most expensive) whiz-bang steel available. If it's not made from CPM 3-V (or something even more expensive), it's necessarily garbage to them.
In other cases some will judge a knife harshly because its design is influenced by a classical design originating from another knife maker (I'm not talking about clones.)
Knives aren't (comparatively) high-tech products. They also aren't extremely complicated machines, nor does each one take a great deal of material or space-age processes to build. Unlike firearms they're also not tightly controlled by laws and trade restrictions.
Ultimately it seems like some are programmed to attack good, even excellent knives because of their low sales price. They're unable to recognize the value such knives represent, so they go searching for a "reason" to judge them as being junk.
Last edited: