Does anyone ever use a Randall knife for its intended purpose?

Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
12
Hi folks. I'm relatively new to the knife world. I've only fairly recently become aware of Randall Made Knives and their influence in the industry and the awe in which they are held. The attention to detail, the craftsmanship, the materials, etc -- it's my understanding that these are high quality using knives, each one ground for a specific purpose, yet whenever I see one for sale on the auction sites, or read discussions about them by their owners on forums, they almost always mention that the Randall knife in question has "never been used, never been sharpened", and many times even, "never been put in case". I've read of several instances where a hunter or a soldier had a Randall knife on them, but instead used another blade for whatever task was at hand, because they "didn't want to ruin such a fine knife". Doesn't this non-use of a knife kind of defeat the purpose of a high-quality, specifically-designed tool? I understand the high value placed on these things makes a person want to take care of them, but isn't the craftsmanship, experience, and attention to detail in manufacturing such a knife going to waste if the end user doesn't actually use it? I see it as like owning a Ferrari but not driving it: You have this highly engineered, highly desirable piece of equipment, designed for one purpose and one purpose only -- to go fast (in the case of RMK's, to cut well) -- and yet it's not being put to that use. I've heard the argument that RMKs are "works of art", and are best taken care of by putting them on display. This to me is like caging a wild animal; a knife was designed to cut.
I was in the Army and when I deployed to the Middle East we got issued a lot of high-priced, "high speed" gear designed for warfighting. At first I took really good care of my equipment and tried to keep as much of my issued stuff as possible unopened in its plastic wrapping or issued case because I didn't to "ruin" such good equipment. Months later I ran into one of my best friends on another base and his equipment was all beat up, scratched, used, and torn to hell. I asked him about it, saying, "Man, don't you take care of your stuff?" He said, "Lemme guess, you haven't even taken yours out of the packages." "Nope!" I said. Then he says, "Listen, this is WAR. THIS is what this equipment is designed for. THIS is its ultimate purpose. This is an actual WAR, and if you don't use this stuff here then there's nowhere else you're going to be able to. Stop 'taking care' of your stuff. Use it, abuse it, beat the hell out of it, because that's what it was made for, to be USED in a war!"
He made a lot of sense, and after that I took my gear out its protective packaging and started to use the hell out of it, and it was all to my benefit.
He was right that day, and now I'm wondering, in this instance, am I? ARE Randall Made Knives best put to use as a trophy item, as many people do, to be put on display and "never used, never sharpened, never put in case"? Or are they best used as a working tool, used to cut flesh, hide, bone, rope, plastic, cardboard, etc, the way they were designed to be?
I appreciate any input.
 
I use mine all the time, and don't tell anyone i even modified the brass gaurd so it would be more comfortable to use, I ground it down to a single hilt so i could choke up on the blade.

I keep another randall #14 (just recently arrived after my long wait :) ) just like it ready to use, in case the worst happens to my favorite.

Does that mean I would do the same thing to some of the other randalls like say a vietnam era model 14, which is quite different in some ways HELL NO. There are collectible randalls out there that should be protected, mine isn't one of those.
 
Yes, I use mine. However, many people buy them as investments as they tend to go up in value .
 
I have been carrying a Randall #14 on and off for the pass year hear in Iraq. In Alaska I have a Model #18 that I take camping sometimes.
 
A stainless #14 standard was my primary fixed blade for about 4 years. It was my belt knife while at camp and hike and I used it from things like food prep to chopping. I regret letting it go... and that's why I'm on the list to get another.

:thumbup:
 
Lots of people use their Randalls, I think you would be surprised. It depends a lot on the knife, though. Am I going to use my ivory-handled 12-11 Smithsonian Bowie? I don't think so. I kinda doubt that the $700 stag and nickel-silver 12-8 will see much use either. I have no problem with using the "cheap" ones, though (as if a $3-400 knife could ever be "cheap").
 
I have several in my collection and one I have been using for years (#15 O1 steel), it is actually one of the very few fixed blades I use. Easy to sharpen and very tough.

IMGP3030.jpg
 
Pic of my 14
And #18
 

Attachments

  • 58666-Randall14L.jpg
    58666-Randall14L.jpg
    41.5 KB · Views: 62
  • randallhike2.JPG
    randallhike2.JPG
    67.6 KB · Views: 60
  • randallhike11.jpg
    randallhike11.jpg
    99.8 KB · Views: 64
very good question...expand it to include high priced knifes in general...for my own self, i have a collections of knifes; i don't buy trophy knifes; every knife i buy is with intent to use rigorously...if a model i want has multiple styles i always opt for the most basic one because it WILL be scratched and worn from use...

and i do have some high priced tools; a large sebenza 21 resides with my fishing gear; it worked hard cleaning fish, cutting food, and slicing thru canvas while camping in the sierras months ago...
 
Back
Top