- Joined
- May 16, 2003
- Messages
- 306
Kind of a "dumb" question, not that it is wrong or anything, more in the random, trivial category. I'm curious if anyone else has NOT bought a knife you liked because of the sheath. I generally prefer simple, understated yet functional sheaths for my knives, so when someone, a maker or second hand, offers up a knife, I often want the tool itself, but because I don't care for the sheath, I pass on the purchase. In effect, a sheath I don't like often becomes a deal breaker. Obviously some people like velvet Elvis paintings or saggy pants or pierced whatever...we're all different, so I'm not implying a "right vs wrong" judgment, simply one of preference. Many makers put a significant amount of work into making an interesting and ornate sheath, and I do not for a second discount the sincerity of their predilections or craftsmanship. However, rather than get a knife I happen to like and accept that I'm going to get rid of the 'offensive' sheath (think heavily tooled, etc), I generally wave off. Anyone else find that the sheath is a significant factor? I guess an ancillary question could go out to the makers of both knives and sheaths, do you find that heavy tooling, ornateness, etc, generally is a desirable thing for the average spec buyer? Does ornate or "fancy" equate to "better" in buyers' minds and, therefore, get preference?