- Joined
- May 16, 2003
- Messages
- 317
Kind of a "dumb" question, not that it is wrong or anything, more in the random, trivial category.  I'm curious if anyone else has NOT bought a knife you liked because of the sheath.  I generally prefer simple, understated yet functional sheaths for my knives, so when someone, a maker or second hand, offers up a knife, I often want the tool itself, but because I don't care for the sheath, I pass on the purchase.  In effect, a sheath I don't like often becomes a deal breaker.  Obviously some people like velvet Elvis paintings or saggy pants or pierced whatever...we're all different, so I'm not implying a "right vs wrong" judgment, simply one of preference.  Many makers put a significant amount of work into making an interesting and ornate sheath, and I do not for a second discount the sincerity of their predilections or craftsmanship.  However, rather than get a knife I happen to like and accept that I'm going to get rid of the 'offensive' sheath (think heavily tooled, etc), I generally wave off.  Anyone else find that the sheath is a significant factor?  I guess an ancillary question could go out to the makers of both knives and sheaths, do you find that heavy tooling, ornateness, etc, generally is a desirable thing for the average spec buyer?  Does ornate or "fancy" equate to "better" in buyers' minds and, therefore, get preference?
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			 
	 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		

 
 
		 
 

 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
  
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		