Joe S., why did you say dubious? You never explained it.
Because they look like LaGriffe's etc.? If that why, you'd be surprised how often some makers ask each other permission to use part or all of another's design, and get the blessing. Professional respect, courtesy, and friendships. So, before you assume theft of a design, assume first it's been arranged with permission.
I should have a cockpit commander and a calcutta in my hands by next week. I'll post pics and tell you what I think. I hear it's very beefy and solid in the hand -- surprisingly so for a small knife...it was described as having "presence."
I love TOPS knives, as many of you know. They all have performed suprebly in the field, under real conditions, for me. One thing I have to say is that the pictures of them do not do them justice at all, as far as the look and execution go. The reason the blades look two-tone in the pics is to highlight the profile, because so many of their blades are purpose-designed for professionals -- there were very specific requirements for different blades by different organizations from around the world. With a lot of the Spec Ops, LEO, and SAR people who buy TOPS blades, it's a matter of functionality first, looks second, so hence the photos being like they are. You really have to hold these knives to appreciate them. They have some of the most comfortable handles in the business.
I've been getting word on what specific TOPS blades were designed for, so, if you have a question on some, I'll be glad to answer it if I know, or find out the answer for you.
Best,
Brian.