- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 27
Hi All.
I found the above item on Ebay and read the description with interest. The seller mentions that "This knife was used in Viet Nam and served me well".
Being a backwards Scot I am now left wondering where my history books were written. I have obviously been misled somewhere along the line into thinking that the Vietnam War ended in 1975. How wrong I must be if this seller used a knife first sold in 1984 during the Vietnam War. Alternatively, maybe Qual-A-Tec, or Buck, or some ultra-secret government department issued these knives to certain people before the public got wind of them.
Or just maybe the seller is trying to up the price by claiming some war related cachet which the knife doesn't possess.
What do the rest of you think?
I have emailed the seller for clarification on this matter, and await his reply with anticipation.
As I mentioned above, I am Scottish, and therefore have no direct links to anything to do with the Vietnam War, or those who served. However, I know enough that it makes me sick to think of someone trying to get a higher price for an item by knowingly making false claims regarding war usage. Perhaps it's just me, but I would have thought the memory of those fallen would be worth more than just a couple of extra dollars on what is already a great knife.
Sorry for the rant.
Over to you...
I found the above item on Ebay and read the description with interest. The seller mentions that "This knife was used in Viet Nam and served me well".
Being a backwards Scot I am now left wondering where my history books were written. I have obviously been misled somewhere along the line into thinking that the Vietnam War ended in 1975. How wrong I must be if this seller used a knife first sold in 1984 during the Vietnam War. Alternatively, maybe Qual-A-Tec, or Buck, or some ultra-secret government department issued these knives to certain people before the public got wind of them.
Or just maybe the seller is trying to up the price by claiming some war related cachet which the knife doesn't possess.
What do the rest of you think?
I have emailed the seller for clarification on this matter, and await his reply with anticipation.
As I mentioned above, I am Scottish, and therefore have no direct links to anything to do with the Vietnam War, or those who served. However, I know enough that it makes me sick to think of someone trying to get a higher price for an item by knowingly making false claims regarding war usage. Perhaps it's just me, but I would have thought the memory of those fallen would be worth more than just a couple of extra dollars on what is already a great knife.
Sorry for the rant.
Over to you...