- Joined
- May 19, 2007
- Messages
- 7,745
This last week I found myself in a rather high stress, rapidly progressing situation. The details of which are not important other than to say I ended up cutting a rope. The tool I grabbed was the leatherman skeletool which I've posted about before. Now, the reason I grabbed the skeletool had nothing to do with its suitability for the task, I didn't have that much time to think. I grabbed it because it was the most familiar piece of gear on my person. I also had a spyderco roadie in my pocket that has only recently been added to my EDC, and a rescue rope cutter which I forgot entirely about.
Why is this important? I don't think there is any need to make sure you have a one-handed blade available at all times, or some high-speed low-drag device. What is important is that in a high stress incident I went for the knife I've been using the most. For those who carry a multi for 90% of the cutting with an extra "special" knife for emergencies, it might be worth considering that in that clinch you might just go for the familiar tool. I don't think that's a bad thing. My rebar would have done the job, as would any SAK. Even a classic would have opened up that rope with no trouble. I think we get trapped into thinking that we need that other rescue knife or need some feature to ensure that we are prepared. But what I took from the incident is that more that features, edge holding, geometry or anything else, you need familiarity with your tools.
I suspect that Carl would agree with me, having operated under high stress conditions with his highly specialized tactical stockman, (or was it a peanut?) either way.
I feel like it would be easy to under-prepare by over-preparing. Too much gear and not enough familiarity. What do you think? I'm still processing the event and trying to get as much out of it as I can. I'll probably never do another live rope cut in my career, but its worth evaluating.
Why is this important? I don't think there is any need to make sure you have a one-handed blade available at all times, or some high-speed low-drag device. What is important is that in a high stress incident I went for the knife I've been using the most. For those who carry a multi for 90% of the cutting with an extra "special" knife for emergencies, it might be worth considering that in that clinch you might just go for the familiar tool. I don't think that's a bad thing. My rebar would have done the job, as would any SAK. Even a classic would have opened up that rope with no trouble. I think we get trapped into thinking that we need that other rescue knife or need some feature to ensure that we are prepared. But what I took from the incident is that more that features, edge holding, geometry or anything else, you need familiarity with your tools.
I suspect that Carl would agree with me, having operated under high stress conditions with his highly specialized tactical stockman, (or was it a peanut?) either way.
I feel like it would be easy to under-prepare by over-preparing. Too much gear and not enough familiarity. What do you think? I'm still processing the event and trying to get as much out of it as I can. I'll probably never do another live rope cut in my career, but its worth evaluating.