Edge difference in these two knives

Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
1,660
I cut up boxes with my knives. I've been using my Kabar tanto (1245) because, you know, the boxes need to be tactically cut ;)

I recently tried my BK-9 and found that it cuts a lot better. On the same box, using the same stance and same movements, the BK-9 would go through like a hot knife through butter. I needed some more slicing movement for the tanto.

The BK-9 recently helped to break down the xmas tree for the garbage folks to pick up, and the tanto has been beating up cardboard boxes for a few, but they were sharpened recently at the same time using the spyderco tri-angle sharpmaker.

I THINK they were equally sharpened, but I was wondering if their geometry had something to do with the cutting difference? According to the Kabar website, the tanto has a hollow grind, and the BK-9 has a flat grind. I thought the hollow grind of the tanto would have been better suited for this kind of cutting, and that the 9 would be better as a hacker/ chopper with its flat.

Can anyone clear this up for me?
 
I cut up boxes with my knives. I've been using my Kabar tanto (1245) because, you know, the boxes need to be tactically cut ;)

I recently tried my BK-9 and found that it cuts a lot better. On the same box, using the same stance and same movements, the BK-9 would go through like a hot knife through butter. I needed some more slicing movement for the tanto.

The BK-9 recently helped to break down the xmas tree for the garbage folks to pick up, and the tanto has been beating up cardboard boxes for a few, but they were sharpened recently at the same time using the spyderco tri-angle sharpmaker.

I THINK they were equally sharpened, but I was wondering if their geometry had something to do with the cutting difference? According to the Kabar website, the tanto has a hollow grind, and the BK-9 has a flat grind. I thought the hollow grind of the tanto would have been better suited for this kind of cutting, and that the 9 would be better as a hacker/ chopper with its flat.

Can anyone clear this up for me?

Yeah, no problem. The BK9 has a thinner edge than the Kabar tanto. The BK9, in the Camillus days, had some real heft, mine seemed heavier, and more akin to a chopping club. Still a great knife. When I got my new Kabar BK9, the balance was different, the edge seemed to sheer and cut better. Side by side, the new BK9 is slightly slimmer, and better weighted, with a more agressive cutting angle.

The width of the BK9 alows the grind to taper off to the edge over a longer span, in a slimmer area, creating better edge to seperate the media at the shoulder of the primary grind.

That and the handle is more comfortable, I would say you don't have to grip as hard to maintain the plane of the knife while cutting.

Just my opinion.

Moose
 
That's really interesting. It might be that since the BK9 is longer, it has more sharpened surface area than the other knife. Or maybe its shape helps facilitate a better spreading of the material, whereas the hollow grind might get a little hung up due to it's shape.
 
The width of the BK9 alows the grind to taper off to the edge over a longer span, in a slimmer area, creating better edge to seperate the media at the shoulder of the primary grind.

Hmm, it does seem that the tanto gets stuck, maybe that's why I feel like I need to slice and put in more effrort.
 
Back
Top