- Joined
- Dec 18, 2010
- Messages
- 160
We all know that the bk2 is not the easiest knife to sharpen. It takes more patience than with most knives because of the angles, weight and dimensions of the knife. Edge geometries generate a lot of controversy and confusion among knife enthusiasts, so I decided to see what my fellow beckeroos have to say about the topic.
1. V vs convex. Convex is durable for field use, however V seems more useful, specially when combined with a coarse edge.
2. Polished is great for push cutting and useful in an urban environment, however but it takes far more time and dedication to maintain. It also seems to lack bite with natural materials whereas the coarse edge seems to be more than sufficient for bushcrafting, survival, etc.
3. I was recently advised to put a V "toothy" or coarse edge on field knives rather than a polished edge. So far I'm satisfied.
Your thoughts?
1. V vs convex. Convex is durable for field use, however V seems more useful, specially when combined with a coarse edge.
2. Polished is great for push cutting and useful in an urban environment, however but it takes far more time and dedication to maintain. It also seems to lack bite with natural materials whereas the coarse edge seems to be more than sufficient for bushcrafting, survival, etc.
3. I was recently advised to put a V "toothy" or coarse edge on field knives rather than a polished edge. So far I'm satisfied.
Your thoughts?