Cliff Stamp
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 5, 1998
- Messages
- 17,562
I came across this recently as I was doing some edits and it illustrates something Jerry has noted many times, basically of the factors in the high edge retention of INFI is its high toughness and ductility :
I cut strips off of a 2' section of the carpet with a CPM-420V fillet knife, the Battle Mistress, and a CPM-10V light utility knife. The edge bevel angles are similar on all three blades. I recorded the number of slices needed to cut off a section, and made four sections with each blade for each trial and a total of four runs. The results are given below :
<TABLE border=1>
<TR><TH>Steel</TH><TH>First run</TH><TH>Second run</TH><TH>Third run</TH><TH>Fourth run</TH></TR>
<TR><TD>10V</TD><TD align=center>2.5 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>4.0 +/- 0.7</TD><TD align=center>2.5 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>3.5 +/- 0.5</TD></TR>
<TR><TD>420V</TD><TD align=center>2.0 +/- 0.4</TD><TD align=center>2.8 +/- 0.5</TD><TD align=center>3.3 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>3.5 +/- 0.5</TD></TR>
<TR><TD>INFI</TD><TD align=center>3.0 +/- 0.4</TD><TD align=center>4.3 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>2.8 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>5.5 +/- 0.5</TD></TR>
</TABLE>
Can anything concrete be said about the edge retention from the numbers alone? Well it looks like the 10V blade was effected the least, but there is too much variance from run to run to really quantify the effect. Ok, can anything at all be gained from the work? Yes. An inspection of the edges reveals some interesting features. The INFI blades is heavily rolled, light reflects from pretty much its entire length. The 10V blade only reflects light from one spot about 2 mm long and the 420V blade similarily showed little impacting/rolling about 4 spots in total each 1-2 mm long. However under magnification the 420V blade showed numerous chips along the edge, the largest of which was 1 mm long by .4 mm deep and was visible to the naked eye. Neither the 10V or INFI blade showed similar chipping.
Does this blunting effect how the blades need to be sharpened? Yes. After some smooth steeling (10 strokes) neither blade showed significant progress. However after 10 strokes on a butchers steel the INFI blade now shaved and all blades sliced paper well. Figuring that the increased mass of the INFI
blade would make steeling more effective I repeated the work with the butchers steel on the CPM blades using more force, however no significant gain was seen. I then used 10 strokes on a 12" fine DMT rod and 5 on an 800 grit ceramic rod and the 10V blade was shaving sharp, the 420V blade still was not, it needed to be sharpened on a benchstone in order to remove the fractures and restore the edge. Basically INFI didn't fracture and just deformed and so was easily restored by steeling, CPM-10V fractured a little and needed some light work with a rod and CPM-420V fractured a lot and need to be honed.
-Cliff
[This message has been edited by Cliff Stamp (edited 04-12-2000).]
I cut strips off of a 2' section of the carpet with a CPM-420V fillet knife, the Battle Mistress, and a CPM-10V light utility knife. The edge bevel angles are similar on all three blades. I recorded the number of slices needed to cut off a section, and made four sections with each blade for each trial and a total of four runs. The results are given below :
<TABLE border=1>
<TR><TH>Steel</TH><TH>First run</TH><TH>Second run</TH><TH>Third run</TH><TH>Fourth run</TH></TR>
<TR><TD>10V</TD><TD align=center>2.5 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>4.0 +/- 0.7</TD><TD align=center>2.5 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>3.5 +/- 0.5</TD></TR>
<TR><TD>420V</TD><TD align=center>2.0 +/- 0.4</TD><TD align=center>2.8 +/- 0.5</TD><TD align=center>3.3 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>3.5 +/- 0.5</TD></TR>
<TR><TD>INFI</TD><TD align=center>3.0 +/- 0.4</TD><TD align=center>4.3 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>2.8 +/- 0.3</TD><TD align=center>5.5 +/- 0.5</TD></TR>
</TABLE>
Can anything concrete be said about the edge retention from the numbers alone? Well it looks like the 10V blade was effected the least, but there is too much variance from run to run to really quantify the effect. Ok, can anything at all be gained from the work? Yes. An inspection of the edges reveals some interesting features. The INFI blades is heavily rolled, light reflects from pretty much its entire length. The 10V blade only reflects light from one spot about 2 mm long and the 420V blade similarily showed little impacting/rolling about 4 spots in total each 1-2 mm long. However under magnification the 420V blade showed numerous chips along the edge, the largest of which was 1 mm long by .4 mm deep and was visible to the naked eye. Neither the 10V or INFI blade showed similar chipping.
Does this blunting effect how the blades need to be sharpened? Yes. After some smooth steeling (10 strokes) neither blade showed significant progress. However after 10 strokes on a butchers steel the INFI blade now shaved and all blades sliced paper well. Figuring that the increased mass of the INFI
blade would make steeling more effective I repeated the work with the butchers steel on the CPM blades using more force, however no significant gain was seen. I then used 10 strokes on a 12" fine DMT rod and 5 on an 800 grit ceramic rod and the 10V blade was shaving sharp, the 420V blade still was not, it needed to be sharpened on a benchstone in order to remove the fractures and restore the edge. Basically INFI didn't fracture and just deformed and so was easily restored by steeling, CPM-10V fractured a little and needed some light work with a rod and CPM-420V fractured a lot and need to be honed.
-Cliff
[This message has been edited by Cliff Stamp (edited 04-12-2000).]