It seems that a lot of knives nowadays (esp. folders) have a slight recurve toward the heel (ricasso) as the op stated. While i agree that it may be because of sharpening technique at the factory, it sure seems that they were deliberately designed that way. On many that i have seen it sure seems like it would take A LOT of metal removal from sharpening to get that recurve. (Obviously i am not talking about knives with a significant, purposful recurve like the crkt shenanigan, boker jim wagner reality series, many 5.11 models, etc.) CRKT seems to be the biggest offender in this. Im guessing that it is done on purpose because it seems to me that it is most common on less expensive knives (but not always). I think most of us when we were first getting into the hobby that we were attracted to the organic blade shapes. My guess is this is just a way for companies to appeal to the general public and drive sales in brick and mortar big box stores. I would assume the VAST majority of folding knife sales under $40 are to people making an impulse purchase, and dont want a knife that looks like their dad's Buck 110 or Case slipjoint.
Just my opinion but who the hell knows. I know that i hate it. And im sure anyone else who sharpens on benchstones hates it too. Sure, i grind it off and get a nice, straight edge but it is definitely a hassle. Sometimes it takes a fair amount of stock removal and time to get rid of even the tiniest recurved heel. Even with the Atoma 140 on the EPA. Still, most of my sharpening i do freehand and its a P.I.T.A! Considering how popular serrated, recurve, and tanto blades with skulls, "seat belt cutters", anemic flippers, and rainbow colored knives are with the general public; i guess we'll just have to deal with it. Ok enough ranting!