- Joined
- Jun 26, 2007
- Messages
- 621
Hi all,
today a brief comparison between two compact fixed blades, the ESEE Izula II and the EKA H8. I will post just my impressions of use, nothing scientific; Ill give a score to the knives just to quantify my impressions.


Lets start whit the EKA H8

The knife is razor sharp

Now, making a stick-point and a notch



Score:
Cutting efficiency: 8,5/10
Handle comfort: 8,0/10
Now, the Izula II

the knife is razor sharp

Now, making a stick-point and a notch



Score:
Cutting efficiency: 8,5/10
Handle comfort: 8,5/10
Final score:
EKA H8: 16,5/20
ESEE Izula II: 17,0/20
The cutting efficiency is a tie, no doubt on this. Both the blades are fairly good cutters, not the best I have tried, but fairly good, one could be enough satisfied. Now, few notes about the handles

As you may see, the handle of the Izula II is thinner and also smaller of the handle of the H8


but for some reason, the Izula handle is more comfortable than the H8 handle, and this is against the previous thoughts I had before the trials.
As a note, the Izula is really compact, it can stay also in the front pocket of my bag

the H8 is compact too, but not as the Izula, it cant stay on the front pocket, just in the main pocket of my bag

Conclusions: my comparison lacks, I just made few works on woods, so again these are just my impressions about the two knives. Against this, I used many knives on these years, so I consider myself good enough to made a fair evaluation

Both these knives are good knives. I like the compactness of both, the good level of fit and finish, the cutting efficiency. What surprise me is the handle comfort of the Izula: as I say again, the handle of the Izula is more comfortable than the H8 handle, and I may work the woods whit the Izula more efficiently. This is weird some way, as I have very big hands.
In brief, I could take both the H8 and the Izula for hiking, but if I had to choose, my final choose is for the Izula, as per the nice cutting efficiency + the handle comfort + the compactness.
Ciao,
Alfredo
today a brief comparison between two compact fixed blades, the ESEE Izula II and the EKA H8. I will post just my impressions of use, nothing scientific; Ill give a score to the knives just to quantify my impressions.


Lets start whit the EKA H8

The knife is razor sharp

Now, making a stick-point and a notch



Score:
Cutting efficiency: 8,5/10
Handle comfort: 8,0/10
Now, the Izula II

the knife is razor sharp

Now, making a stick-point and a notch



Score:
Cutting efficiency: 8,5/10
Handle comfort: 8,5/10
Final score:
EKA H8: 16,5/20
ESEE Izula II: 17,0/20
The cutting efficiency is a tie, no doubt on this. Both the blades are fairly good cutters, not the best I have tried, but fairly good, one could be enough satisfied. Now, few notes about the handles

As you may see, the handle of the Izula II is thinner and also smaller of the handle of the H8


but for some reason, the Izula handle is more comfortable than the H8 handle, and this is against the previous thoughts I had before the trials.
As a note, the Izula is really compact, it can stay also in the front pocket of my bag

the H8 is compact too, but not as the Izula, it cant stay on the front pocket, just in the main pocket of my bag

Conclusions: my comparison lacks, I just made few works on woods, so again these are just my impressions about the two knives. Against this, I used many knives on these years, so I consider myself good enough to made a fair evaluation

Both these knives are good knives. I like the compactness of both, the good level of fit and finish, the cutting efficiency. What surprise me is the handle comfort of the Izula: as I say again, the handle of the Izula is more comfortable than the H8 handle, and I may work the woods whit the Izula more efficiently. This is weird some way, as I have very big hands.
In brief, I could take both the H8 and the Izula for hiking, but if I had to choose, my final choose is for the Izula, as per the nice cutting efficiency + the handle comfort + the compactness.
Ciao,
Alfredo