I've done a fair amount of looking around & reading about both knives, but wanted to ask some opinions of those who've had (or currently have) these two in their arsenal.
I've owned a number of the Emerson CQC-7's (all tanto blades, though), and am looking for a nicer knife to carry & use, with a std blade, not the tanto (and not serrated).
I know there is a decent difference in price ($120-$200 for a waved Emerson, vs. ~$350-420 for the CRK Sebenza), but I'm not too focused on the $$ aspect.
Also I know that Emerson uses 154CM steel, verses the S30V for the Reeves knife. I only have two other knives with the S30V, and they seem to stay a little sharper than the 154CM. Plus, all the knives I have w/ 154CM have black blades and the two w/ S30V have blasted silver blades, which I think looks nicer.
So, thoughts, suggestions? The good, bad, or ugly? Any other makers I'm leaving out (Russell, perhaps?).
Thanks for your time!
I've owned a number of the Emerson CQC-7's (all tanto blades, though), and am looking for a nicer knife to carry & use, with a std blade, not the tanto (and not serrated).
I know there is a decent difference in price ($120-$200 for a waved Emerson, vs. ~$350-420 for the CRK Sebenza), but I'm not too focused on the $$ aspect.
Also I know that Emerson uses 154CM steel, verses the S30V for the Reeves knife. I only have two other knives with the S30V, and they seem to stay a little sharper than the 154CM. Plus, all the knives I have w/ 154CM have black blades and the two w/ S30V have blasted silver blades, which I think looks nicer.
So, thoughts, suggestions? The good, bad, or ugly? Any other makers I'm leaving out (Russell, perhaps?).
Thanks for your time!