Emerson reliability truth

Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
1
I have read so many reviews of Emerson Knives that have been saying that Emerson's are garbage. I want to tell the truth. This is the deal with an emerson knife. The knife is excellent in robustness; horrible with finish, period.

First let us define knives in general, at one end we have Spyderco. The design of a Spyderco is excellent, the fit and finnish is par to none; this can not be argued. Now when we question the durability of a knife, Sypderco is on the loosing end. Why? Simply because Spyderco Knives are designed to cut, not to act as a pry-bar or hammer. We will call this #10 on a scale from 1 - 10. Spydercos are meant for pure cutting performance, not for abuse. Now on the other end of the abuse scale are the fixed blade knives; #1. Obvioulsy the fixed blade knives are on an entirely different level than folders, but semi-recently Cold Steel with their "Trid-Ad Lock" (This I know by experience) is the best you can get to a fixed blade, and are good enough to compare.

The truth of the deal is this:

Emerson: These knives from what I have seen owning a few, is this, bad finish with a lot of durability and robustness.

Spyderco: Excellent fit and finnish with beyond excellent cutting performance, will fail in robust usage.

Simply that the Emerson will hold up to abuse that will make any other tactical folder of similar spec fail. However the spyderco will out cut the Emerson @ 57-59 RC. in many tasks.

I must admit I am a bit drunk when writing this. However my point remains valid.

Spyderco is about the best knife you can buy for pure cutting performance.

Emerson Knives are the kind of tactical folder you buy to keep a decent edge and abuse like it is going out of style.
Simply put, if my job asked me to cut things every single day I would totally get a simple Endura 4 by Spyderco in ZDP-189, but if I had to survive in the wilderness for 10 days I would certainly opt for the Emerson. This is due to the the materials and Design. I have server in the military and have had many different folders. The emerson is the one I would take on a long mission where I have no idea what will happen. The spyderco is the knife I would take If I was planning on pure cutting needs.

Spyderco = best folding knife for using as a knife, hands down.
Emerson = best knife for suing as whatever tool you lack, but need.

This is what it is, sure am emerson out of the box will not look nearly as nice as many of your other knives; but it will out perform them all when the situation calls for it.
 
I really just don't get it when you guys say that the fit and finish on emerson's sucks. I've owned over 20 different emerson knives and not a single one had any type of fit or finish problems. No they are not as nice to look at as a spyderco. They are what they are. The cqc7 is one of my favorites I've had 5 and they all were exactly the same.
I've also owned many spyderco's. Never had a problem with one of them either. I guess I agree with your main point. I would also abuse my emerson's more than a spyderco and I would use a spyderco more for slicing (even though an emerson could do just as well). As far as fit and finish with an emerson goes though I have yet to see a problem.
 
I've owned 'em all. Emerson's are as good as any. I also think the Emerson reputation for being exceptionally 'rugged' is overstated as well--I've never had a folder fail. I broke the very tip off a Kershaw once, but that was due to operator error. And I still have that knife after 25 years of use. Having said that, I'd chose an Emerson over a Spyderco any given day: I had a Spyderco lock fail due to poor ergonomics. The base of my finger would release the lock when using it for heavy cutting; it was just the way the lock was designed. Spyderco did nothing when I brought it to their attention.

You want to assert that Spyderco's are superior to Emerson's? Show me.
 
i own several emersons and havent had a fit a finish with any. i did just pick up a benchmade mini barrage and it failed on the 3 deployment. blade would only open half way. after losing the pivot stud it then became an auto opener. (sorry of topic but this kinda proves that every brand has a couple sour apples)
 
I have read so many reviews of Emerson Knives that have been saying that Emerson's are garbage. I want to tell the truth. This is the deal with an emerson knife. The knife is excellent in robustness; horrible with finish, period.
....
Emerson: These knives from what I have seen owning a few, is this, bad finish with a lot of durability and robustness.

Spyderco: Excellent fit and finnish with beyond excellent cutting performance, will fail in robust usage.

Simply that the Emerson will hold up to abuse that will make any other tactical folder of similar spec fail. However the spyderco will out cut the Emerson @ 57-59 RC. in many tasks.
....
I must admit I am a bit drunk when writing this. However my point remains valid.
.....
Spyderco is about the best knife you can buy for pure cutting performance.
....
Emerson Knives are the kind of tactical folder you buy to keep a decent edge and abuse like it is going out of style.
Simply put, if my job asked me to cut things every single day I would totally get a simple Endura 4 by Spyderco in ZDP-189, but if I had to survive in the wilderness for 10 days I would certainly opt for the Emerson. This is due to the the materials and Design. I have server in the military and have had many different folders. The emerson is the one I would take on a long mission where I have no idea what will happen. The spyderco is the knife I would take If I was planning on pure cutting needs.

Spyderco = best folding knife for using as a knife, hands down.
Emerson = best knife for suing as whatever tool you lack, but need.

This is what it is, sure am emerson out of the box will not look nearly as nice as many of your other knives; but it will out perform them all when the situation calls for it.

There are other companies out there that fulfill the same market for tactical folding knives. ZT, Kershaw, Benchmade, Hogue, and a few others. Their designs may share similar features, but they're not 100% the same in materials or performance at varying price points.

Your thread title is misleading. You use the term "review" - that would imply that you actually evaluated specific knife models in a comparison test and tested them to failure.

So far you've reiterated Mr. Emerson's argument, but where is your evidence to back it up? Do you have a video or any photos related to destruction tests?

So far the "truth" in your first post isn't significantly more substantial than the armchair quarterbacking by the legions who detest Emerson's fit and finish.
 
Back
Top