Personally, I don't own Emersons because they are pry bars, etc. Toughness to me is relative to the task which my personal Emerson Knives will be forced to accomplish. That task is to cut an attacker off of me, or several of them.
So, in light of my blatantly simple task list, the Emerson Commander and several other models shine. They are fast and sharp. They are tough enough to accomplish the task that I have set for them.
1. A maximum state of edge retention is not important to me personally, because I'm not going to whittle with them. If I have to use them, I probably won't own the knife in question anymore anyway.
2. For practice, I do test cut and I prefer ease of re-sharpening tempered with edge retention.
3. Any knife, fixed blade or folder can be broken, I don't care what manufacturer it is or what "secret oils and sacred chants" they use during forging or stock removal. Any tool or weapon can be broken. I would no sooner use my Emerson Commanders for a pry bar then I would my Benelli Tactical Shotgun as a crutch, even though with the buttpad, it would make an effective crutch.
4. The Wave is the fastest deployment of any folder that is currently sold, up to and surpassing high-tech Automatic Knives like MicroTechs, etc.
So, I have a unique view on things. I know anything can be broken so I know what a screwdriver is for, I know what a pinch bar is for and I know what knives are for and I do not confuse any of these things. I don't confuse a knife with a spade, nor do I particularly care if the knife will whittle through 15 2X4s, 2 62 Buicks and a Partridge in a Pear Tree and still pop hair. As long as it pops hair out of the box and I can get it back that way with relative ease, I consider myself rather fortunate.
I'm not being a smartass or anything, these are just the very simple set of guidelines that I want in a "Tactical Knife" because "Tactical Knife" to me simply means, primarily for Edged Weapon Defense.
[This message has been edited by Don Rearic (edited 01-17-2001).]