Zerileous said:
What about the sharpmaker was superior. For some reason i really enjoy the process of a benchstone. Other than the varying motion, and perhapse ease, what does the sharpmaker add?
I kind of enjoy stone sharpening too, but it's slower to get the finest edge on a stone compared a a V setup where you can just swipe it fairly fast before walking out the door. That's the most important part to me, since I don't usually let my knives get dull.
I find it really easy to slip up on a flat stone. You have to concentrate more on a flat stone compared to a rod setup, and it only takes once slip to scratch a nice shiny blade. It also only takes one stroke at the wrong angle to set you back a few. I really just prefer to not have to think about it as I work, even though I could do it either way.
The included stones are also pretty good quality. I always used a Lansky rod for final sharpening because it was the finest thing I had. Unfortunately, it was a little too small (long-ways movement of the blade is bad, so longer stones are better) and no other Lansky I could find was as good. I have some arkansas stones and some fine ceramic rods, but none of them are as smooth as the old Lansky (including newer Lanskys). I saw a very well used Sharpmaker in a store, and it was as smooth and flawless as my old Lansky rods. I still use flat diamond stones to set the bevel right, but once that is out of the way I switch to regular maintenance with a rod sharpener.
I swear the Sharpmaker, with just a little bit of care, can sharpen a knife darn near as good as I can on a good flat stone. The only way I can do better on a flat stone is with a lot of slow and careful work, and even then the difference is small, probably beyond what the blade can hold for more than a single cut.
The only thing I might bother to sharpen on a good flat stone is some high speed steel at 63+rc. That reminds me, I should try out my Fallkniven U2 on the Sharpmaker.