Hello everyone,
I am new to posting but have been lurking around the forum for quite some time now. I have recently purchased the ESEE 6 plain model. When I first opened the package I noticed one strange thing about the knife: the blade spine appears to be much thinner than the handle portion. Out came the caliper and indeed, the blade spine is 0.8 mm thinner than the handle tang. Now, I understand that this is a full flat grind knife, but the thinning of the spine is not gradual, like for example in the case of the Izula.The thinning of the stock starts abruptly right at the jimping area. Moreover, it appears that except for the tip, the thinnest section of the knife is actually right in the middle of the knife, where the grind starts. This is visible when you move a bit the blade and observe the light reflecting off of it (maybe I will have to come back with some pictures to better explain this). Anyways, it just seems odd that the handle stock part of the knife is thicker than the blade. I see no point to it. This just makes the knife more handle heavy, restricting the chopping capability. Perhaps ESEE is overlooking some things in the manufacturing process. I did not get a defective knife as the problem with the blade spine thickness has been reported in the past http://jungletraining.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-15932.html . Anyway, I am sure that the knife should be a good performer.
Please let me know your opinion about this.
All the best!
I am new to posting but have been lurking around the forum for quite some time now. I have recently purchased the ESEE 6 plain model. When I first opened the package I noticed one strange thing about the knife: the blade spine appears to be much thinner than the handle portion. Out came the caliper and indeed, the blade spine is 0.8 mm thinner than the handle tang. Now, I understand that this is a full flat grind knife, but the thinning of the spine is not gradual, like for example in the case of the Izula.The thinning of the stock starts abruptly right at the jimping area. Moreover, it appears that except for the tip, the thinnest section of the knife is actually right in the middle of the knife, where the grind starts. This is visible when you move a bit the blade and observe the light reflecting off of it (maybe I will have to come back with some pictures to better explain this). Anyways, it just seems odd that the handle stock part of the knife is thicker than the blade. I see no point to it. This just makes the knife more handle heavy, restricting the chopping capability. Perhaps ESEE is overlooking some things in the manufacturing process. I did not get a defective knife as the problem with the blade spine thickness has been reported in the past http://jungletraining.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-15932.html . Anyway, I am sure that the knife should be a good performer.
Please let me know your opinion about this.
All the best!
Last edited: