Esee vs cold steel

Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
195
I'm looking to get my brother a knife to take camping with us, he told me he likes the ESEE 5 and the new Cold Steel AK fixed blade. I was leaning towards the ESEE since it has a better sheath but the AK has better steel. What would you guys do? Thanks
 
ESEE uses good steel even if it isn't the latest and greatest -- it is tried and true.

But the ESEE 5 is not really a camp knife, it is a demolition machine, designed for evasion and survival. It's overkill for camping.

The Becker BK 2 is a similar pattern but a better cutter than the ESEE 5. Check out the ESEE 4 or 6.
 
Very good choice. Tough as nails, will slice nicely, big enough for anything short of sugar cane. :D
 
For the price of the AK fixed, you could have a Becker BK-16, a Sven Saw, and a Snow and Neally Hatchet. Or a Falkniven F1 and the Sven Saw. I know you asked between the two choices, but I'm not a huge fan of the Cold Steel knives, and the ESEE knives I've handled have been very uncomfortable with their slab handles.

If you're looking for an all-in one, either will do. But I'd also consider the Beckers - there are a number of all-rounders in that series.
 
Both are going to be well made knives. In my opinion both fall more into the military survival knife category than a true outdoors knife. The Cold Steel is 5mm thick and the Esee is a true 1/4" or 6.35mm. Thats just way too heavy of a knife for me.

In that price range there are lots of seriously good outdoors knives that will excel at cleaning game, cutting cordage, and carving wood which is what you want in a outdoors knife.

Personally I think a Mora Bushcraft Black would be a better choice than either of those two. If you want heavier duty the BK16 is about as thick of a knife as I would go.

If I had to pick between the two choices you listed I would go Esee. I like some of Cold Steel's stuff and would generally choose them, but the AK47 is a new knife design and also I prefer the blade shape of the Esee to the CS's clip point.

Remember this is just my opinion. Some people like the added comfort and assurance they get from holding a really heavy duty blade, I just prefer a lighter knife for most situations. If you think he wants/needs a heavy knife like the Esee 5 then that is what you should get him. I don't think either knife is a bad choice.
 
ESEE's heat treat and warranty are top notch, so that is my choice.
 
The 5 is a wrecking machine. The 4 or 6 are better camping knives. The cold steel would be good if you were fighting adamantium armored cyborgs in the arctic while jumping off forklifts after you expend all your boar spears.
 
The 5 is a wrecking machine. The 4 or 6 are better camping knives. The cold steel would be good if you were fighting adamantium armored cyborgs in the arctic while jumping off forklifts after you expend all your boar spears.

Ha ha!
 
I'm looking to get my brother a knife to take camping with us, he told me he likes the ESEE 5 and the new Cold Steel AK fixed blade. I was leaning towards the ESEE since it has a better sheath but the AK has better steel. What would you guys do? Thanks

When you get down to it
Esee made in USA, Cold Steel made in Taiwan (matters to many people, especially when they're similarly priced)
ESEE has a "you break it, we replace it no questions asked" warranty. Cold Steel is 1 year against workmanship.

Sure the steel in the AK is better than ESEE 1095 (assuming CS has a good heat treat) but 1095 is far from a bad steel (its also much easier to sharpen than 3v)

Anyways, the ESEE 5 isn't exactly a camp knife. Its a sharpened survival prybar. I'd look at a 4, Laser strike, or a 6 as they're more suited to general camp tasks
 
Easy. ESEE. better warranty. the 4 or 6 would be better for camp stuff. I have the 3 and its great, but the handle is small for a lot of guys. Rowen does magic with the 1095 (okay, not really, but they make a very good blade) You can absolutely beat on a 4 without much worry. and your secondary value on the ESEE is going to be much better than it is on the CS, Largely due to that bulletproof warranty.

There are still a lot of other options, but of your picks, that's the direction I'd go. Nothing wrong with moras or beckers, and worth looking at in future as needs and tastes change.
 
Would have to agree with many here and go with an Esee model. You can find them at a good price online, and the warranty is bulletproof. Although in my mind a nice Becker would also hit the right spots.
 
I've yet to touch a AK-47 field knife It could be a really decent little knife but I dunno /shrug.

Esee, becker, mora, Ontario,Condor where to start looking.

Look around Find something that either catches your eye or wins your heart.
 
I would have a really hard time picking 1095 over 3v at a similar price point, but a sheath that works is good enough for me and slabs that fit are more important than what they are made of.
I'd never pay $60 or whatever for micarta handles, then another $60 for a kydex sheath personally. And that seems to be about what EESE is charging for those over the becker/ ontario lines.
1095 is my favorite steel of those that I have tried, from a price to performance standpoint. Good mix of all properties, strength, edge retention, toughness, ease of sharpening, wear resistance, customization, it all falls in line on a nice Becker or Ontario or custom here on the forums.
$150+ 1095 knife? I'll take some 3V instead. Though at the price cold steel wouldnt be my choice either.
For about $80 you can get an Ontario Marine Raider Bowie- a giant chunk of tough as hell 1095 steel with a good sheath and nice handle. Spend the balance on stuff to sharpen all your knives and live happy. YMMV
 
I'd never pay $60 or whatever for micarta handles, then another $60 for a kydex sheath personally. And that seems to be about what EESE is charging for those over the becker/ ontario lines.

The BK16 and BK2 can both be found for around $70 from a little google searching, the ESEE 4 and LS can be found for right around $100 and the 6 can be had for $113. I'm a huge fan of the Becker and ESEE lines both but those numbers are off. Or, equally as likely, I misunderstood you entirely :D
 
The BK16 and BK2 can both be found for around $70 from a little google searching, the ESEE 4 and LS can be found for right around $100 and the 6 can be had for $113. I'm a huge fan of the Becker and ESEE lines both but those numbers are off. Or, equally as likely, I misunderstood you entirely :D

Math is hard after cheap rum and 4th celebrations. $60 total, $30 each was what I was going for, lol.
 
I'm looking to get my brother a knife to take camping with us, he told me he likes the ESEE 5 and the new Cold Steel AK fixed blade. I was leaning towards the ESEE since it has a better sheath but the AK has better steel. What would you guys do? Thanks

Since the knife is a gift for your brother try to find out which one he likes better. There is no way for you or us on the forum to second guess which knife he desires most.

Personally I view ESEE knives as over rated JMO.
 
Esee hands down, but not the 5, the 4,6, or laser strike. I view Esee as underrated, and that view comes from owning and using almost all of them. JMO of course :thumbup:
 
The Esse 4 is a nice knife but the handle is a little on the small side (I have medium sized hands) and I get fatigued using it for extended use.
 
When you get down to it
Esee made in USA, Cold Steel made in Taiwan (matters to many people, especially when they're similarly priced)
ESEE has a "you break it, we replace it no questions asked" warranty. Cold Steel is 1 year against workmanship.

Sure the steel in the AK is better than ESEE 1095 (assuming CS has a good heat treat) but 1095 is far from a bad steel (its also much easier to sharpen than 3v)

Anyways, the ESEE 5 isn't exactly a camp knife. Its a sharpened survival prybar. I'd look at a 4, Laser strike, or a 6 as they're more suited to general camp tasks


It's 5yrs on CS fixed blades FYI.
 
Back
Top